On 4/3/2023 11:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Adding relevant registers needs more work and it's not
> clear what the use-case will be as currently only
> the PCI transport is supported. But let's keep the
> door open on this.
> We already say it's reserved in a central place, but it
> does not hurt to remind implementers to mask it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <>
> ---
>
content.tex | 12 ++++++++++++
>
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 5057df2..f7446bf 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2364,6 +2364,18 @@ \subsection{Legacy interface}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over M
>
>
Notification mechanisms did not change.
>
> +\subsection{Features reserved for future use}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO / Features reserved for future use}
> +
> +At this time, devices and drivers utilizing Virtio Over MMIO
> +do not support the following features:
> +\begin{itemize}
> +
> +\item VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ
> +
> +\end{itemize}
> +
> +These features are reserved for future use.
> +
>
\section{Virtio Over Channel I/O}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over Channel I/O}
>
>
S/390 based virtual machines support neither PCI nor MMIO, so a
Reviewed-by: Zhu Lingshan <>
