Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [ws-brsp-comment] Another ws-i bsp1.1 test tool issue ?
Thanks Jacques for you quick
response.
BTW, what's the date for this month meeting ?
Thanks,
Jim
On 03/07/2014 06:44 AM, Jacques Durand wrote:
Jim:
You seem to be right: requirement
R5206 does not apply in your case. The test tool for BSP11
is wrongly failing your message.
That is my opinion, but the TC will
probably confirm this at this month meeting.
Thanks,
-jacques
From:
[mailto:] On
Behalf Of Jim Ma
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 6:17 AM
To: ;
Cc: Alessio Soldano
Subject: [ws-brsp-comment] Another ws-i bsp1.1
test tool issue ?
Hi All,
This might be another wsi-bsp test tool issue.
When I checked the compliance with BSP 1.1 test tool against
following message:
<wsse:SecurityTokenReference xmlns:wsse11="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.1.xsd"
wsse11:TokenType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLV1.1"
wsu:Id="STR-3C1588359FBECE435C139384414735011">
<wsse:KeyIdentifier ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.0#SAMLAssertionID">_3C1588359FBECE435C139384414734810</wsse:KeyIdentifier>
</wsse:SecurityTokenReference>
The reports generated by analyzerV11 says this message
breaks the R5206:
<entry referenceID="message_3-strKeyIdentifier-2"
type="strKeyIdentifier" value="">
<assertionResult id="BSP5206" result="failed">
<failureMessage xml:lang="en">The wsse:KeyIdentifier
ValueType attribute is incorrect</failureMessage>
<failureDetail xml:lang="en">The wsse:KeyIdentifier
ValueType attribute is incorrect</failureDetail>
</assertionResult>
But R5206 is for checking the X509_TOKEN, here it is an saml
assertion id.
R5206 Any STR_KEY_IDENTIFIER that
references an X509_TOKEN MUST have a ValueType attribute
with the value of "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509SubjectKeyIdentifier"
or "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-soap-message-security-1.1#ThumbprintSHA1".
Attached is the message logged by monitor.sh. Can you see if
it's a tool issue or anything I missed to configure ?
Thanks,
Jim
Next in thread →
Next in month →