Is it correct to say that Eric holds the change token against Mark's
latest? After Eric's changes come in today, how do we proceed to a TC
release?
Greg
Greg Pavlik wrote:
> If the activity is the execution, then no, we don't manage it. On the
> other hand, what is this context thingy before we start to do any
> operations?
>
> Newcomer, Eric wrote:
>
>> I had started making a few changes also. Perhaps the best thing for
>> me to do is start over with this version.
>>
>> Everything I spotted was editorial except for one thing, which was a
>> statement that we were managing activities. I have seen this also in
>> Microsoft material. The difficulty is that we are calling activity
>> an abstract notion for which we are managing context. I do not think
>> we create or manage the activity itself, do we?
>>
>> I'll get the rest input as soon as I can.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Little [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:27 AM
>> To: Greg Pavlik; ws-caf-editors
>> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>>
>>
>> Comments in line. I accepted all of the changes and then made some more.
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Greg Pavlik" <>
>> To: "ws-caf-editors" <>
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:36 PM
>> Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> This is the latest revision for the proposed committee draft. I urge
>>> you
>>> to read it carefully with the change bars turned off; please be
>>> especially diligent in looking for errors.
>>>
>>> Mark, WSDL+Schema on the way for packaging things up for the TC to
>>> review.
>>>
>>> We're getting close. Thanks to everyone for their hard work.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
