>
> Aren't both ways of doing message correlation? What the service does
> with regards to the message correlation is up to the service. If the
> message decides that the correlated messages will refer to a
particular
> resource, that's up to the message. That begs the question why come up
Ooops. Sorry... "that's up to the message" -> "that's up to the service"
> with yet another way of doing message correlation, especially when the
> WS-Context approach is scalable to multiple participants.
.savas.
