Need help on i093

My 
fellow simians,

 

I 
need some help on i093. After talking things over with Doug Bunting I think 
I have a pretty good understanding of the issue. Here's my sense of 
it:

  
Imagine an English sentence with [subect], [verb], [object]. Doug 
  Bunting is saying that, if that sentence carries RFC2119 semantics, the 
  [subject] cannot be a thing like an XML element or a part of some document, 
  etc. but instead should be some kind of software component that someone 
  implements. For example it is incorrect to say "The 
  <foo:baz> element MUST contain a <foo:splat> attribute . . .". It 
  is correct to say "Foo Service implementations that send 
  <foo:baz> messages MUST include <foo:splat> as an attribute of the 
  <foo:baz> element . . ."

Unfortunately most of the WS-RM document (haven't looked as WS-RM Policy) 
uses phrasing like "This REQUIRED element MUST . . .". I've fixed the examples 
that Doug Bunting called out in the issue description and cleaned up all of 
SequenceAcknowledgement. However that still leaves CreateSequence, 
CreateSequenceResponse, CloseSequence, CloseSequenceResponse, TerminateSequence, 
TerminateSequenceResponse, Sequence, and AckRequested left to clean 
up.

 

I'm 
a bit busy right now and I need some help in order to turn this around in a 
timely fashion. If everyone could do a couple of sections it shouldn't take too 
much time. You can cut and paste from my phrasing or (obviously) concoct your 
own. Thanks (in advance) for any help.

 

- 
gp