RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call

From
Abbie Barbir <>
Date
2005-07-19T11:45:13+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
+1
abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:] 
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:17 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay
> Cc: wsrx
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion 
> on 7/21 conf-call
> 
> 
> Sanjay,
> 
> With regards to these issues, I think that we should first 
> focus on the 
> requirements and usage scenarios
> rather than discuss any specifics as to how we might address 
> them. I think 
> I made this point on the last call.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: 
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> "Patil, Sanjay" <> wrote on 07/18/2005 
> 03:18:10 PM:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > i006  Source based delivery QoS policy assertion
> > 
> > 
> http://www.oasis->
open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/
> > Re
> > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i006
> >   Please see Tom's posting on 7/14 for use cases and motivations: 
> >     http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00108.html
> > 
> > i008  Policy assertions granularity
> > 
> > 
> http://www.oasis->
open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/
> > Re
> > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i008
> > 
> > i009  Declaration of QoS policies
> > 
> > 
> http://www.oasis->
open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/
> > Re
> > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i009
> > 
> > On the 7/14 conf-call, Tom kindly agreed to own the issue i006. He 
> > also posted a set of use cases and motivation summary  on 
> 7/14 (before 
> > the conf call - see link above). Please check this and 
> other relevant 
> > email discussion before the next conf-call.
> > 
> > The above listed issues seem to be interrelated.  It will 
> be great to 
> > have someone first present to the TC a wider context that 
> highlights 
> > the interrelationships, based on which we can set an order for 
> > discussing these issues and avoid going in circles. Any volunteers?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Sanjay
> 
> 
>