RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call

+1

abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:53 PM
> To: Patil, Sanjay; wsrx
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion 
> on 7/21 conf-call
> 
> 
> I agree with other's that we should focus on the use cases 
> for these scenarios. I also agree that these issues are 
> related and note that in particular i006 is dependent upon 
> i009, and in the examples being provided i008 as well.
> 
> I will make an effort to update the schema for the issue list 
> to capture dependent issues. This will likely take the form 
> of two optional fields, i.e. 
> <issue 
> i006...>...<dependent>i009</dependent><dependent>i008</dependent>...
> <issue i009...>...<blocks>i006</blocks>....
> 
> We should be able to then draw up a dependency tree as we 
> raise additional issues.
> 
> Regards,
> Marc g
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:] 
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 12:18 PM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 
> 7/21 conf-call
> 
> 
> 
> i006  Source based delivery QoS policy assertion  
>  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re
liableMessagingIssues.xml#i006
  Please see Tom's posting on 7/14 for use cases and motivations: 
    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00108.html

i008  Policy assertions granularity
 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re
liableMessagingIssues.xml#i008

i009  Declaration of QoS policies
 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/Re
liableMessagingIssues.xml#i009

On the 7/14 conf-call, Tom kindly agreed to own the issue i006. He also
posted a set of use cases and motivation summary  on 7/14 (before the
conf call - see link above). Please check this and other relevant email
discussion before the next conf-call.

The above listed issues seem to be interrelated.  It will be great to
have someone first present to the TC a wider context that highlights the
interrelationships, based on which we can set an order for discussing
these issues and avoid going in circles. Any volunteers?

Thanks,
Sanjay