The use of Offer itself is optional as is the decision to accept it or
not at the RMD.
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 6:22 AM
To: wsrx
Subject: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
I have a question on the resolution of issue i090 as recorded at
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/17304/Mi
nutesWSRX-031606.html
The resolution restricts the offered sequence to a single EPR. This
constraints/conflicts with the resolution of an issue (can't recall the
issue number) that introduced that following text at line 139-140 (in
CD-03):
"Note that this specification makes no restriction on the scope of the
RM Source or RM Destination entities. For example, either may span
multiple WSDL Ports or endpoints."
The intent of that resolution was to allow RMD and RMS to span multiple
WSDL endpoints, EPRs etc. Was this conflict discussed during the
concall? At least in the minutes this is not captured. If it was
discussed, can someone post the rationale for reverting the previous
decision? Was there any discussion on making
/wsrm:CreateSequence/wsrm:Offer/wsrm:Endpoint optional?
Thx!
-Anish
--
