Can you confirm that NO change is required to the State Tables as part
of your proposal?
/paulc
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:]
> Sent: March 2, 2006 11:42 AM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
>
> Title: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
>
> Description:
> If the RMD terminates the sequence, the RMS cannot know which messages
> are acknowledged. That is why we added CloseSequence. We should
> recommend that RMD's use CloseSequence rather than TerminateSequence.
>
> Justification:
> At the moment the spec says the RMD "may" close the sequence. However,
> unless there is a specific reason (e.g. resource issues, security
issues
> etc), it is better if the RMD closes rather than terminates.
>
> Target: core
> Type: editorial
>
> Proposal:
>
> From WD-10:
>
> At line 381: Replace:
> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a
> sequence it may 'close' the sequence itself."
> with
> "In the case where the RM Destination wishes to discontinue use of a
> sequence it is RECOMMENDED that it 'close' the sequence."
>
> Related issues: None
>
> Thanks to Stefan Rossmanith for pointing this out.
>
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
>
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
