Re: [ws-rx] compromise proposal for i122-4

From
Christopher B Ferris <>
Date
2006-07-18T16:41:35+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-rx] compromise proposal for i122-4
-1

Christopher Ferris

STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy

email: 

blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440

phone: +1 508 377 9295

Tom Rutt <> wrote on 07/17/2006
02:31:02 PM:

> Paul Fremantle wrote:

> 

> >I'm trying to understand the latest "concrete" proposals
for the

> >security issues.

> >

> >Based on Doug Buntings note last week, and the discussions since
then.

> >

> >1) latest from Microsoft and IBM 

> ><http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00036.html>
modified by Gil

> >-  http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00070.html,
and agreed to

> >at least by Marc.

> >

> >2) latest from Oracle and SAP

> >http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00075.html also modified
by

> >Gil's http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00070.html

> >

> >3) Close no action from Doug Bunting.

> >http://lists.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/200607/msg00088.html

> >

> >Can the owners of these proposals (and any others I missed) please

> >confirm these are the latest that you support.

> >

> >Thanks

> >Paul

> >

> >  

> >

> I have a new compromise proposal to discuss.

> 

> Let the sending side pick either Oracle or Microsoft way to send STR.
 

> (some implementations seem to be able to support one way better over
the 

> other).

> 

> The receiving side would have to accept create sequence messages with

> the str in either place (i.e., in security header with usage attribute,

> or directly in

> createSequence element in body). 

> 

> The receiving implementation would look in both places if the 

> wsrm:UsesSequenceSTR element is present as a soap header.

> 

> Tom Rutt

> 

> -- 

> ----------------------------------------------------

> Tom Rutt   email: ; 

> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732
774 5133

> 

>