RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 7/27 conf-call

Is there a proposal for i140 anywhere?

________________________________

From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
Sent: Wed 7/26/2006 1:22 PM
To: Bob Freund-Hitachi; 
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 7/27 conf-call


 
I think that makes sense. 
-- Sanjay


________________________________

	From: Bob Freund-Hitachi [mailto:] 
	Sent: Wednesday, Jul 26, 2006 13:15 PM
	To: Patil, Sanjay; 
	Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 7/27 conf-call
	
	

	Sanjay,

	Could we discuss issue 145 before issue 113?

	Thanks

	-bob

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:] 
	Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:01 PM
	To: 
	Subject: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on the 7/27 conf-call

	 

	 

	a> i113 Tightening up the state tables 
	  http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i113 <http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i113>  

	b> i140  add sub-headings to fault descriptions 
	  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00190.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00190.html>  

	c> i143 messages have to be received for them to be examined: with new highlighting 
	  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00200.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00200.html>  

	d> i145 Implications of Sequence Expiration not specified 
	  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00216.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00216.html>