I don't understand what is not clear
with that fault.
-Doug
"Patil, Sanjay"
<>
07/27/2006 01:10 PM
To
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <>,
"[WS-RX]" <>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue
140
Hi Bob/Anish, thanks for producing
the proposal.
Can the proponents of the MakeConnection
solution (or any body else for that matter) suggest text for elucidating
the Unsupported Selection fault?
- Sanj
From: Bob Freund-Hitachi [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 2:59 AM
To: [WS-RX]
Subject: [ws-rx] proposal to address issue 140
Anish has been kind enough to prepare the
attached draft proposal to address issue 140.
While preparing this draft, some additional
points were raised which we enumerate below:
Sequence Terminated Fault:
There is no text that details under what
conditions a sequence terminated fault might be raised other than mention
of a vague “protocol error”.
One way to address this is to list some or
all of the conditions in section 4, however it is more concise to represent
these in the state tables of appendix D were normative.
Unsupported Selection
This fault description deserves elucidation
Thanks
-bob
