Re: [ws-rx] Updated proposal for (as yet) unumbered issue: Need fault toindicate that security constraints have been violated

RM does not know about any security constraints so I have no idea how RM can throw this, as this would have to come from the security processing or policy processing

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

"Gilbert Pilz" <>

"Gilbert Pilz" <> 

07/30/2006 05:48 PM

To

<>

cc

Subject

[ws-rx] Updated proposal for (as yet) unumbered issue: Need fault to indicate that security constraints have been violated

Attached is an updated proposal for the security fault issue. It is

provided in the form of a change-bar version of wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15. The

changes are against the 7/28 version of the document (#44 in Kavi's list

of revisions).

There are three additions to the spec. Section 4.10 has been added to

describe the wsrm:SecurityViolation fault. A paragraph has been added to

section 6.1 that describes when the fault may be used. A similar

parapgraph has been added to section 6.2 to describe the possible use of

the fault when protecting a Sequence using SSL/TLS.

- gp

[attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15.pdf" deleted by Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM]