Re: [ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version and diffs from June 29 version

From
Doug Davis <>
Date
2006-07-06T19:52:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version and diffs from June 29 version
More comments on the state tables:

RMS Table:

Why does "<CloseSequence>"
have the <>'s?

In the SeqAck(final) [msg] row, I think
you just can just "Process Ack" not "Process Ack/Nack"
since a final Ack can't contain a Nack.

InvalidAck [msg] row, I'm not sure they
would generate an InvalidAckFault since that seems to imply they may be
sent in response to this msg,  I think an 'No action' is more consistent
with you other cells.

RMD Table:

CloseSequence autonomously and SeqAck
autonomously have <>'s

Still don't get the differ between N/A
and blank.  :-)

thanks,

-Doug

"Bob Freund-Hitachi"
<> 

07/05/2006 06:02 PM

To

"[WS-RX]" <>

cc

Subject

[ws-rx] State tables, July 5 version
and diffs from June 29 version

Changes state names from connecting/connected
to creating/created

Changes xmit faults to generate failts

Other minor references[attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05.doc"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-15-ith-ST-Edits2006-07-05-diffs.doc"
deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]