I think this naming convention is good too. The main requirement would
be that the RDDL files are retrievable by a HTTP GET on the respective
namespace URI.
Here is the overall map of the links to their artifacts :
1> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608 ==>
wsrm-1.1-rddl-200608.html
2> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/ ==>
wsrm-1.1-rddl-200608.html
3> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04.pdf
==> wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04_diff.pdf
4> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04.html
==> wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04.html
5> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04.odt
==> wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-04.odt
6>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/wsrm-1.1-schema-200608.xsd
==> wsrm-1.1-schema-200608.xsd
7>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200608/wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200608.wsdl
==> wsrm-1.1-wsdl-200608.wsdl
8> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608 ==>
wsrmp-1.1-rddl-200608.html
9> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/ ==>
wsrmp-1.1-rddl-200608.html
10>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.pdf
==> wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.pdf
11>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.html
==> wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.html
12>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.odt
==> wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.odt
13>
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/wsrmp-1.1-schema-200608.xs
d ==> wsrmp-1.1-schema-200608.xsd
-- Sanjay
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robin Cover [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, Aug 17, 2006 15:53 PM
>To:
>Cc: 'Gilbert Pilz'; 'Paul Cotton';
>Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRM-CD4.zip uploaded
>
>In support of Mary's request that the two RDDL documents be given
>filenames similar to the one we've been seeing [1], and similar
>to those in the CD02 and CD03 releases, an alternative which
>equally satisfies the OASIS Open Library web site architecture
>and naming guidelines would be something like:
>
>wsrm-1.1-rddl-200608.html
>wsrmp-1.1-rddl-200608.html
>
>In such case, these URIs would be considered "Latest version: "
>URIs, allowing the TC to version the actual file instances of
>the RDDL documents (if desired), and even to rev the spec
>to a CD05 under the same namespace, were that to become an
>emerging need. It may be preferable not to code the CD version
>directly into the RDDL "Latest version: " URI, since a
>RDDL namespace document documents a namespace, not a CD release.
>
>Mary's suggestion works fine if that's what the TC wants.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Robin
>
>[1]
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19791/wsrm-1.
>1-rddl-cd-04.html
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19792/wsrmp-1
>.1-rddl-cd-04.html
>
>On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Mary McRae wrote:
>
>> Hi Gil et al,
>>
>> I took a quick look at the zip package and would like to
>make one request -
>> OASIS is reserving the use of any filenames used by the
>system/server - such as
>> index.html. In the CD02 and CD03 releases, the RDDL files
>used the following
>> naming convention:
>>
>> wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-0#.html
>> wsrmp-1.1-rddl-cd-0#.html
>>
>> Would you mind renaming the two index.html files to
>conform to the convention
>> already in place? If you'd prefer, we can rename these files
>on upload to the
>> docs server so you don't need to recreate the package. Let
>me know which you
>> would prefer.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Mary
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:]
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 5:32 PM
>> > To: Paul Cotton;
>> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRM-CD4.zip uploaded
>> >
>> > Could you raise these as PR issues so we can track them?
>> >
>> > - gp
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Paul Cotton [mailto:]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 1:45 PM
>> > > To: Gilbert Pilz;
>> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRM-CD4.zip uploaded
>> > >
>> > > Initial comments on the RM HTML:
>> > >
>> > > a) Status section uses an unusually small font. This is
>different
>> > > than the PDF text.
>> > > b) Standalone URLs and XML fragments use an unusally small
>> > font. This
>> > > is different than the PDF text.
>> > > c) All the XML fragments I have reviewed have lost their
>> > indentation.
>> > > This includes the XML Schema and WSDL files in the Appendices.
>> > > d) The Event and State Name example cells appear to have an extra
>> > > blank line in them.
>> > > e) All the Detail fragments I have reviewed have lost their
>> > background
>> > > colour. This is different than the PDF text.
>> > >
>> > > /paulc
>> > >
>> > > ________________________________________
>> > > From:
>> > > Sent: August 17, 2006 3:59 PM
>> > > To:
>> > > Subject: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRM-CD4.zip uploaded
>> > >
>> > > The document revision named WSRM-CD4.zip has been submitted
>> > by Gilbert
>> > > Pilz to the OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange
>> > > (WS-RX) TC document repository.
>> > > This document is revision #5 of WSRM-CD4.zip.
>> > >
>> > > Document Description:
>> > > CD4 package of files
>> > > RM spec, RMP spec, WSDL, XSD and diffs from CD3 Add HTML version;
>> > > directory structured for deployment on doc.oasis-open.org
>> > >
>> > > View Document Details:
>> > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/document.ph
>> > p?document_id=19802
>> > >
>> > > Download Document:
>> > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.ph
>> > p/19802/WSRM-CD4.zip
>> > >
>> > > Revision:
>> > > This document is revision #5 of WSRM-CD4.zip. The
>document details
>> > > page referenced above will show the complete revision history.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
>> > > application may be breaking the link into two pieces.
>> > > You may be able to copy and paste the entire link
>address into the
>> > > address field of your web browser.
>> > >
>> > > -OASIS Open Administration
>> > >
>>
>>
>
