Title: Message
do we
really need to add issues for pure editorial comments?
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006
8:08 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx]
New proposed issues for Aug 10th call
All new proposed
issues are attached since we still do not have archives. I would suggest that
as these are all editorial we could possibly accept them all as one issue for
the issue list to process rather than taking each individually. We could of
course separate out any from such a grouping that did need
discussion.
Propoes-01 location
of normative XSD
Propoes-02 runon
sentence in section 2
Propoes-03
editorial def'n of RMS and RMD
Propoes-04 clarify
second bullet in Protocol Invariants
Propoes-05 RM
Protocol Elements dives right into extensibility discussion, no
intro
Propoes-06
use of capitalization for defined terms
Propoes-07
Inconsistent use of single and double quotes for values
Propoes-08
WS-RX Public Review
Propoes-09
Text describing extensibility syntax in WS-RM needed in WS-RM
Policy
Propoes-10
Missing period on line 347 of WS-RM
Propoes-11
Weird gap on page 21
