Title: Cancelling 4/24 conf-call
Hi Doug,
I am not quite sure if the last call was strictly
necessary.
Do you believe that the comment you referenced is
sufficient to warrant a conf-call? I had personally thought of that comment
as a request for more information which could be
handled either offline or after the end of the public review.
The currently open Public Review ends on May 3rd, 2008, and holding a
call on 5/22 to take care of any potential new business originating from the
Public Review, etc, makes sense to me.
Does anybody else think that a conf-call on 4/24 is a good
idea? I am not necessarily opposed to holding a conf-call on 4/24, but would
like to make sure that sufficient number of people are interested in having that
call.
-- Sanjay
From: Doug Bunting
(WSSP) [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, Apr 20,
2008 20:44 PM
To: Patil, Sanjay
Cc:
Subject: RE: Cancelling 4/24
conf-call
Sanjay,
We
held the last call after some discussion. What is different this
time?
Separately,
should we discuss the received public review comment?
thanx,
doug
From: Patil,
Sanjay [mailto:]
Sent: April-20-08
20:37
To:
Subject: [ws-rx]
Cancelling 4/24 conf-call
Folks,
I haven't
noticed any pressing business that would warrant having a conf-call on 4/24.
I am
inclined to cancel the 4/24 conf-call and hold the next conf-call on 5/22
unless I hear otherwise by EOB on 4/21.
--
Sanjay
