Am I correct in assuming that item (1) below was discussed on today's
WS-SX call but item (2) is new?
/paulc
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:]
> Sent: January 18, 2006 10:22 AM
> To:
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick
> Subject: [ws-sx] Potential XPath Issues for WS-SecurityPolicy
>
> Some potential issues related to XPath in WS-SecurityPolicy.
>
> (1) In the SignedElements and EncryptedElements policy assertions of
> WS-SecurityPolicy, an XPath expression is used to specify what
> elements should be signed/encrypted. However, there appears to be no
> text that says an XPath MUST be namespace-qualified (and examples
> have not ns-qualified the XPaths).
>
> Proposed resolution: add text saying that an XPath expression MUST be
> namespace qualified
>
> (2) define a limited set of XPath expressions that MUST be supported
> by an implementation (and list explicitly )
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
