Re: [wsbpel-reqts] issue coordination call Wed. Aug 13 - 11am eastern

I must have had an subtraction fault (11-3=9).  It was supposed to be 8am pacific just like the tc meetings.  No wonder there weren't as many folks on as I expected!  My apologies for the confusion.  

I'll try to put a summary of what we discussed together later for the group.

Regards, Diane

IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

Sid Askary <>

08/13/2003 01:27 PM

        

        To:        Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

        cc:        

        Subject:        Re: [wsbpel-reqts] issue coordination call Wed. Aug 13 - 11am eastern

I tried around 9 PDT and there was no one on line. Did you mean On the west 

coast it would be 8:00 AM?  Did I miss the call already?

-Sid

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:21:43 -0600, Diane Jordan <> wrote:

> We have an issue coordination subgroup call tomorrow, Wed. Aug 13, at 11 

> am eastern/9 pacific/5 Germany.  Dial in is:  1-877-988-8393, int'l 203 

> 566-8013, pc 484868.   Agenda items are:  develop a plan for issues to 

> cover in the Aug. 20 call, start plans for those to put on the f2f 

> agenda.

>

>

> Some input for discussion: I've gotten input from some of the initial 

> authors on issue priorities and possible categories which may be of 

> interest to the TC:  They've also agreed to act as champions for a number 

> of these, where others haven't volunteered - I'll be getting Peter an 

> email with the names/numbers sometime tomorrow.    If these seem 

> reasonable to the group, we may want to start organizing the discussion 

> of issues on calls or at the f2f around categories.

>

> In terms of potential issues for the next call, based on the email 

> traffic, I'm thinking we can ask the following folks if they would be 

> ready with a proposal for discussion/possible resolution on the next 

> call: issue 2 - Kevin Liu, issue 45 - Danny van der Rijn, issue 11 - 

> Yaron Goland/Danny v., issue 33 - Bernd Eckenfels, issue 44 - Mike Marin. 

> If so, I will put them on the agenda and try to get a proposal circulated 

> by end of day monday.   Let me know if you have others to suggest.

>

> I've forwarded a note below from Alastair Green suggesting we devote a 

> large part of the agenda at the f2f to a proposal from Choreography 

> dealing with compensations issues.  Its not clear whether this would 

> cover outstanding compensation related issues or new ones (or what 

> combination). I'd like your opinions on this.

>

> For those on copy - if you care to join the call, you are welcome as 

> always.

>

> Regards, Diane

> IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies

> 

> (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

>

> ----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 08/12/2003 06:09 PM -----

>

>

> "Green, Alastair J." <>

> 08/06/2003 09:58 AM

>

> To:     Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <>, 

> <>

> cc:     "Haugen Robert" <>, "Pope, Bill" 

> <>, "Furniss, Peter" 

> <>, "Fletcher, Tony" 

> <>

> Subject:        Proposed item(s) for F2F agenda

>

>

>

> Dear Diane, John and Monica,

> We in Choreology are working up a comprehensive submission proposing 

> additions to the current BPEL draft to take account of business 

> transaction management (BTM). This submission is in line with the TC 

> Charter work item on recovery and exception handling, and is in pursuit 

> of the draft's statements on the need to define relationship of BPEL to 

> BTM.

> The proposal will incorporate 5 to 10 distinct issues (complete with 

> outline proposed solutions and named issue champions); will show how 

> business transaction scopes can be generated, propagated between 

> processes and web services; how processes will act as participants in 

> such business transactions, and how processes can determine transaction 

> outcomes.

> We are working to obtain support from other TC members before publishing 

> the full submission, likely in the first week of September.

> We would like to see a full day of the 2.5 day F2F dedicated to this 

> major theme -- from the issues list, discussion at the last F2F, and 

> informal discussion thereafter, we believe this is a substantial topic of 

> wide interest within the TC.

> Wanted to let you know this before raising it at today's call, if the 

> issue of F2F agenda is indeed being discussed.

> Yours,

> Alastair

>

-- 

Sid.