RE: [wsbpel-reqts] Issues list and new issues procedures

Title: Message

That's 
a much better idea. It shall be so.

 

Peter

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Jordan 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: 09 September 2004 22:45
To: 
  Furniss, Peter
Cc: bpel rqmts
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-reqts] 
  Issues list and new issues procedures

How about "voting to open issue" as an alternative to 
  "voting to accept as enhancement".  The latter could be interpreted to 
  mean we were voting on the enhancement itself.  
Regards, Diane
IBM 
   Emerging Internet Software Standards

(919)254-7221 
  or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

  
    
    

      "Furniss, Peter" 
        <> 
        
09/08/2004 08:45 AM 

      
        
          
          

            
              
To

            "bpel rqmts" 
              <> 
          

            
              
cc

            
          

            
              
Subject

            [wsbpel-reqts] Issues 
              list and new issues procedures

        
          
          

            
            

I've just made the changes to the issue list scripts to 
  handle the new procedures for new issues, and submitted the proposed issues 
  from Tony and one I got yesterday from Dieter Koenig. I had to invent status 
  names for the stages in the new procedure: 
  
arrives from tc 
  member = received 
tc does not 
  accept immediately, ballots on wheher bug = "voting to accept as bug" 
  
bug ballot fails, super-ballot underway 
  = "voting to accept as enhancement" 
  
  
of course if any of the decisions or 
  ballots succeed, the status goes to "open". And if the formal votes are in the 
  same meeting, the transition through the voting to accept status will be too 
  short to appear on the list. 
  
I'm not too happy about the status name while the 
  super-ballot is underway - there aren't any of these yet of course, so there's 
  time to change it. 
  
There is a new table of issues that haven't been accepted 
  yet, and issues with all three statuses above would appear there (and have 
  colours of purple, blue and navy according to the scripts as it is at the 
  moment). There's a bit of explanation there and in other places in the list 
  (before the first and after the last of the tables) that this group might want 
  to check (and which might affect what seem like good status names.) 
  
  
Peter 
  
  
------------------------------------------
Peter Furniss
Chief 
  Scientist, Choreology Ltd
web: http://www.choreology.com
email: 
phone: +44 870 739 0066
mobile: +44 7951 536168