[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Issue 160 Omission]]]

Alex,

I didn't know I have the pen.

I'll take care of adding this.

Assaf

Alex Yiu wrote:

>
> Hi Assaf,
>
> Since you are having the pen, do you think you can take care about 
> this omission?
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[wsbpel-spec-edit] [Fwd: Issue 160 Omission]
> Date: 	Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:51:55 -0700
> From: 	Alex Yiu <>
> To: 	bpel spec <>
> CC: 	Alex Yiu <>, Assaf Arkin <>, 
> 
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Cindy McNally has discovered an editorial mistake when incorporating 
> Issue 160 into the spec. I guess we have another to-do item for 
> editors after the F2F.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Issue 160 Omission
> Date: 	Thu, 08 Sep 2005 14:26:31 +0000
> From: 	Cindy McNally <>
> To: 	
>
>
>
>Hi Alex,
>
>A part of your resolution for issue 160 was left out of revised spec (as of 
>cvs rev 1.84.)
>
>"An BPEL implementation MAY provide a configurable mechanism to enable or 
>disable schema validation of incoming and outgoing messages during the 
>execution of Web Service related activities, e.g., receive, reply, pick, 
>onEvent and invoke activities. The details of configuration mechanism is out 
>of the scope of this specification."
>
>Without this paragraph, this implies that only explicit validation, i.e. 
>using validate activity or validate attrib on assign, is available to users, 
>which was not your intent.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>  
>