Re: Editing of Issue 120

Alexandre - 

I wasn't at the Raleigh F2F where this was decided.  (You might want to
check the minutes.)  However, I would say that use of
implementation-specific correlation isn't dependent on the absence of
explicit correlation.

Alexandre Alves wrote:

  
  
  

  
Danny,

  
 

  
The proposed resolution
of issue 120 is not very detailed
(http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue120).
As I think you were the champion for this issue, please confirm if my
editing
is satisfactory:

  
 

  
In Section 9.2:

  
 

  
- from:

  
 

  
The examples in this section show
correlation being
used on almost every messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke).
This is
because WS-BPEL does not assume the use of any sophisticated
conversational
transport protocols for messaging. In cases where such protocols are
used, the
explicit use of correlation in WS-BPEL can be reduced to those
activities that
establish the conversational connections

  
 

  
- to:

  
The examples in this section show
correlation being
used on almost every messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke).
This is
because WS-BPEL does not assume the use of any sophisticated
conversational
transport protocols for messaging. In cases where such protocols are
used, the
explicit use of correlation in WS-BPEL can be reduced to those
activities that
establish the conversational connections. In another words, if
there is no explicit correlation set used in an inbound messaging
activity
(initial or non-initial), an implicit implementation-specific
correlation
mechanism MAY be used.

  
Thanks,