Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] compensation handling issue resolutions (207,207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229)

Title: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] compensation handling issue
resolutions
(207, 207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229)

Hi all,

I am done with XSD changes:

--  Apply Issue 217: changing "compensate" activity and adding
"compensateScope" activity 

Danny ... the pen is yours now.

Regards,

Alex Yiu

Alex Yiu wrote:

  
  

Yes, I got the pen.

Hopefully, I can pass the pen back to Danny by the end of Thursday.

  

Thanks!

  

Regards,

Alex Yiu

  

  

Danny van der Rijn wrote:
  
    
According to my notes, Alex is next up to confirm XSD changes, then me.

    

Danny

    

Dieter Koenig1 wrote:
    
      
      
      

      
Hi Diane, I applied the compensation handling
issue
resolutions (207,

207.1, 216, 217, 226, 229), and checked-in version 1.110.

      

Please pass the pen to the next spec editor (sorry, I don't remember
who is

next).

      

Notes to the spec-editing team:

      

(0) When I tried to check in the new version, I made a couple of CVS
user

errors. Hopefully nothing is damaged - I will make sure this does not

happen the next time. Just in case, I attached the new version of the
spec

to this note -- also attached the two new pictures (not yet checked in).

      

(1) Issue resolution 217 (new activity "compensateScope") did not
provide

specific spec text - I therefore changed text in many places where we
just

had "compensate" in the past. At the start of 12.3.3 ("Invoking a

Compensation Handler"), I also moved a few paragraphs up/down in order
to

fit with the generic introduction and the specific sections for each

compensate activity ("compensateScope" and "compensate").

      

(2) I slightly modified the heading structure under 12.3.3 ("Invoking a

Compensation Handler") because compensation of scopes nested in event

handlers was under "Compensation for Scopes in Repeatable Constructs".
This

was followed by "Compensation within Handlers" which does not consider

event handlers. The result is a compromise between Alex' and my earlier

proposals:

  12.3.3. Invoking a Compensation Handler

    12.3.3.1. Compensation of a Specific Scope

    12.3.3.1. Default Compensation Behavior

  12.3.4. Compensation within Repeatable Constructs or Handlers

    12.3.4.1. Compensation Handler Instance Groups

    12.3.4.2. Compensation within Repeatable Constructs

    12.3.4.3. Compensation within Fault Handlers

    12.3.4.4. Compensation within Compensation Handlers

    12.3.4.5. Compensation within Termination Handlers

      

(See attached file: 1.110 - wsbpel-specification-draft.doc)(See attached

file: compensation-within-handlers.ppt)(See attached file:

compensation-within-fault-handler.jpg)(See attached file:

compensation-within-compensation-handler.jpg)

      

Kind Regards

DK