Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: Have we applied second resolution of Issue 123 to spec text yet?
I agree, it seems that both 123 - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00074.html 223 - http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue223 are not yet done, and it makes sense to me addressing them together. Kind Regards DK Dieter K霵ig Mail: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Sch霵aicher Strasse 220 Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 B鐽lingen Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle. com> To -open.o 01.03.2006 00:30 rg cc Diane Jordan <>, Chris Keller <> , Alex Yiu <>, Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE Subject Have we applied second resolution of Issue 123 to spec text yet? Hi fellow editor members, I am trying to prepare the spec text for Issue 241. (That will include a minor tweaking of Issue 123's second resolution). And, I was trying to searching text like "IMA" or "This resolution follows the same scoping rules" in the doc. But, I cannot find it. It seems to me that we have not applied second resolution of Issue 123 yet (propoosed by Chris) yet (?!). http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00074.html I think that explains why DK discovered the missingReply description is completely missing after restructuring. During my restructuring, I was expecting Issue 123 will cover the missingReply desc (See Note [AY19]: "... A new resolution of Issue 123 will update that part of text as well." ) Anyhow ... let's confirm whether we got Issue 123 applied. If not, we may want to apply Issue 223 as well. http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue223 Resolution of Issue 223 amends resolution of Issue 123 in a minor way. Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu
Next in thread →
Next in month →