RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Issue 82.1 - Resolution

From
Charlton Barreto <>
Date
2006-03-13T23:22:15+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Issue 82.1 - Resolution
Thanks, Alex.

 

I still think we shouldn’t implement
it this way. Any elaboration on templateInstance:.. belongs with the prefix definition
in 13.4.1. 

 

Cheers,

 

-Charlton.

--

Adobe Systems Incorporated

+1 (408) 536-4496 p



From: Alex Yiu [mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, 13 March 2006 14:59

To: Diane Jordan

Cc: Charlton Barreto;
; Alex Yiu; Francisco Curbera

Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit]
RE: Issue 82.1 - Resolution

 

Hi,

The subject line is indeed a bit misleading. I also missed that email.

I guess I also need to look at that email closer. 

Charlton, I attached that email archive HTML here, in case you don't have the
web access.

Thanks!

Regards,

Alex Yiu

Diane Jordan wrote: 

Charlton, 

See
this email for an explanation of the editing -  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel-spec-edit/email/archives/200602/msg00045.html

The
subject was misleading so you may have missed it.  There were no replies
to it that I've seen or objections on the calls, but if that doesn't mean we
can't still fix it if need be.   

Regards, Diane

IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards



(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile:
919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

 

  
  
"Charlton
  Barreto" <> 

  
03/13/2006 05:15 PM 

  
  
  
   

    
    
To

    
    
    
<>
    

    
   

   

    
    
cc

    
    
    
<>
    

    
   

   

    
    
Subject

    
    
    
[wsbpel-spec-edit] RE: Issue
    82.1 - Resolution

    
   

  
  
 

  
   

    
    
 

    
    
    
 

    
   

  
  

  
 

Reviewing the latest spec in CVS, I saw that the
changes for Issue 82.1 were for the most part incorporated. However, there was
one place where I had a question: 

  

Section 13.4.3, paragraph 3 reads: 

  

“All start activities MUST be defined in a process of
this Template Profile. This implies that NO new start activity (that is a
message inbound activity annotated with a createInstance=”yes”
attribute) is allowed to be added during executable completion. The Template
Profile introduces a new “template”createInstance” attributed
for use with opaque activities, since the standard “createInstance”
attribute defined in the common abstract process schema is not allowed on
opaque activities.” 

  

Why was the second sentence (“The Template Profile
introduces….”) added? It is redundant since we’ve already
covered this concept earlier in Section 13.4. 

  

The paragraph should read (conforming to our accepted
resolution of Issue 82.1): 

  

“All start activities MUST be defined in a process of
this Template Profile. This implies that NO new start activity is allowed to be
added during executable completion (that is, a message inbound activity
annotated with a createInstance=”yes” attribute). 

  

Best, 

  

-Charlton. 

-- 

Adobe Systems Incorporated 

+1 (408) 536-4496 p 



 

From: Charlton Barreto

Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2006 14:54

To: ''

Subject: Issue 82.1 - Resolution 

  

Attached
is a zip archive (change the extension to .zip to expand) of the spec text,
based on a clean snapshot of the latest draft, containing my approved
resolution for Issue 82.1 with Rania’s amendment.   

 

Please
let me know if you have any questions. 

 

-Charlton.

--

 

  
  
   

    
    

    
    
    
Charlton
    Barreto

    Sr .Computer Scientist

    Adobe Systems Incorporated

    345 Park Avenue, MS E15

San Jose, CA
     95110-2704 USA

    408.536.4496 p   

    415.692.5396 v

     

    
   

  
  

  
 

  

 

smime.p7s