Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for May 28-29 WS BPEL TC face to face)

From
Eavid QQ Vebber - W[M ebusiness
Date
2003-06-04T13:29:27+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Questions (RE: [wsbpel] Proposed agenda for May 28-29 WS BPEL TC face to face)
Satish,

Surely this is only important if there are dependencies.  I'm assuming
if they are - they are deferred dependencies, so they can be
resolved by a later step, as either critical, or non-critical.

We should be able to draw on parallel processing microprocessor
theory here to provide mechanisms to control this?

DW.
========================================================
Message text written by "Satish Thatte"
>So you are saying that there are four scopes that complete in
non-deterministic order and two of them have commutative compensations and
two don't?
 
And what would be the proposed solution?  Annotating the commutative
compensations to say <may be run in whatever order i.e. concurrently>?  How
would you invoke them (assuming they have parameters)?  What if the
commutative ones must be run concurrently but after the non-commutative
ones?   
<
Next in thread → Next in month →