← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Issue - 283 - clarification on what happen to isolation domain sharing when a CH is called from FCT-Handler of an isolated scope
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received". The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL. Issue - 283 - clarification on what happen to isolation domain sharing when a CH is called from FCT-Handler of an isolated scope Status: received Date added: 5 May 2006 Date submitted: 05 May 2006 Submitter: Alex Yiu Description: Currently, we don't have spec text to state what happen to isolation domain sharing when a CompensationHandler is called from an FCT-Handler (fault, compensation and termination handler) of an isolated scope. Submitter's Proposal: After the bullets headed by "The use of error handling features in an isolated scope is" , add: The compensation handler actually shares the isolation domain of the invoking FCT-handler of the immediately enclosing scope. Changes: 5 May 2006 - new issue To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 283 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 283 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar. To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →