← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [wsdm] What comes first: The Sandwich Approach to Development
I agree that designing a solution for mgmt. of web services is an end goal that this TC should focus on. However, I don't see how we can do a good job of that without considering how this information is retrieved, accessed, and exposed and how what we have modeled is implemented. If I can make an analogy, it is like saying that we want to build a 5 story building with all sorts of features and we will worry about the material we use to build this building later! Unfortunately, many features that we may want to build into this house won't be supported by the intrinsic behaviors and capabilities of some materials and no matter how nice the house looks in our mind, its construction will fail because we have not considered the features of the materials and the infrastructure that we may likely use to build this house. [ BTW: If you ask any good building constructor, they will give you the same argument :) There is also a great story about a large auto company that tried to build a revolutionary car without considering the material that should be used to build it. The project was a big failure... I can send it separtely to whoever that is interested]. We are also likely to over engineer somethings if we don't take some features of the building blocks and the infrastructure into account and create an unnecessarily heavy weight solution in addition to introducing other types of problems (e.g. lack of flexibility, scalability, etc.) So, I strongly believe that we will not be able to create a successful solution if we do one (mgmt. of) without having an eye on the other (mgmt. through). I also like to caution everyone to not jump on any bandwagons without considering the requirements of what we need to accomplish. We should certainly consider work that is done and being done elsewhere (e.g. W3C, DMTF, GGF, etc.) but having wrapped our minds around them is very pre-mature before we even look at their pros and cons in the context of this TC and whether they even meet our needs. Regards, H. ---
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →