Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsdm] wsee requirments in mows

From
Potts, Mark <>
Date
2003-09-25T22:51:07+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsdm] wsee requirments in mows
Title: Message

+1

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Sedukhin, Igor S 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 
  2:12 PM
To: Pourheidari, Homayoun; 
  
Subject: RE: [wsdm] wsee requirments in 
  mows

  
To 
  me this requirement clearly belongs to Application + Systems Management. Why 
  is it important for MOWS in the first run? We want to address federated 
  management of WSs through which messages are flowing and identify what is 
  required for that. I do not think that this kind 
  of fine-grained manageability information is required for federated 
  management. For other cases, each particular manager can do root cause 
  analysis and easily match what Web applications WSs belong to and manage 
  WebApp environment, but that is not MOWS, that is MUWS, if you 
  will.

  
 

  
This 
  belongs to MUWS which is to devise a way to manage various resources 
  and represent their relationships. WS is one and WSE is another 
  resource. Therefore, may be we should have MOWSE requirements 
  someday.

  
 

  
I'm 
  also not yet clear that there is a way to actually uniquely identify WSE for a 
  given WS without getting down to App+System+Networks management. What if 
  services are geographically spread in an "akamai"-sort of environment. What 
  would be the WSE there? What if it is a load balanced farm, etc.? What would 
  be that "entity which 
  directly hosts an execution instance" in these 
  cases?

  
 

  
Then, there is no definition of an execution instance 
  in the MOWS requirements document yet. There has to be one to include 
  definitions that you proposed.

  
 

  
In WS terms, a 
  client hits an endpoint with a request and cares only if that has, will, or 
  would do properly to the agreement. It's the WS's side manager's 
  responsibility to dig through instances, servlets, app servers, etc. to 
  resolve issues. The later can be done today and may be improved with 
  standardization, the former needs standardization or it will not work at 
  all.

  
-- Igor Sedukhin 
  .. () 
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, 
  Islandia, NY 11788 

  
    

    
-----Original Message-----
From: M. Homayoun 
    Pourheidari [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 
    10, 2003 8:14 PM
To: 
Subject: 
    [wsdm] wsee requirments in mows

Folks,

As 
    promised, here are the wsee requirements that I think we should include in 
    the mows requirements list.

Cheers,
H.
---

In the 
    Glossary change the definition of a wsee from:

Any software entity 
    which hosts Web services and provides useful features to enable Web services 
    to perform their tasks.
...

to: 

Any entity which directly 
    hosts an execution instance of a Web service and provides services and 
    functionality necessary for the execution of the instance.

In the 
    requirements list (section 2) add:

The wsee should provide 
    manageability capabilities and information specific to Web services. This 
    would include (but not be limited to) events, metrics and controls that are 
    specific to a hosted Web service execution instance.

The 
    manageability representation should allow monitoring and control of wsee -- 
    the execution environment in which the web service 
  runs.

Next in thread → Next in month →