RE: [wsdm] Do URIs for capabilities include date?

Title: [wsdm] Do URIs for capabilities include date?

Yes, IMO, URIs for capabilitues MUST include date. So +1.

  
-----Original Message----- 
From: Vambenepe, 
  William N [mailto:] 
Sent: Tue 10/26/2004 8:04 PM 
  
To:  
Cc: 
Subject: 
  [wsdm] Do URIs for capabilities include date?

  
Hi all,

I believe at the F2F I volunteers to lead the 
  discussion on whether the
URIs used to represent capabilities should 
  include the date of the spec
in them or not.

I'd like to suggest 
  that they do, for this reason: we don't know at this
point how the spec 
  will evolve and whether we will later decide to
redefine the capabilities 
  or not. But even if we decide not to, it is
not a problem to have a date in 
  the URI. W3C specs have the release date
in their targetnamespace. This 
  doesn't imply that the namespace will be
obsoleted. It just makes it more 
  convenient to do so if we decide to.

So I propose that we keep using 
  the same URI format that we use
throughout the document, including the date 
  (to the month).

Regards,

William

To unsubscribe from this 
  mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.