Next in thread →
Next in month →
Fw: [wsrf] WSDM requirements for WSRF
The WS-RF TC heard our request today and it was granted to add a Any as an AnyOther as a child of the Metadata element. So now we just have to sort out operations. Heather Kreger STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems" 919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 ----- Forwarded by Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM on 11/14/2005 12:54 PM ----- Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 11/11/2005 06:07 PM To , cc Subject [wsrf] WSDM requirements for WSRF Hi, The WSDM TC would like to discuss the following requirement for the WS-RMD specification with WS-RF. WSDM needs an any extension point back in the WS-RMD document. - WSDM needs the ability to add management metadata on non-property components, for example on relationships, notifications, and of course operations - We also anticipate that there will be a need to describe metadata on other kinds of aspects of ws-resources, like associated policies or agreements. - We believe that if WS-RMD did not allow extension then other communities/specs that have metadata requirements will invent thier own metadata documents and we'll end up with sets of overlapping and disconnected metadata documents about the same ws-resource. We do not think that WSDM should define thier own metadata document format to cover all other aspects of WS-Resource metadata EXCEPT properties. Just as a heads up, WSDM is continuing to discuss other requirements for WS-RMD may make additional requirements. We would like to discuss this extension point requirement at the Monday November 14th WS-RF meeting. Thanks, Heather Kreger WSDM TC Cochair 919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
Next in thread →
Next in month →