Next in thread → Next in month →

Fw: [wsrf] WSDM requirements for WSRF

From
Heather Kreger <>
Date
2005-11-14T17:56:46+00:00
ID
Thread
Fw: [wsrf] WSDM requirements for WSRF
The WS-RF TC heard our request today
and it was granted to add a Any as an AnyOther as a child of the Metadata
element.

So now we just have to sort out operations.

Heather Kreger

STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies

Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"



919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

----- Forwarded by Heather
Kreger/Raleigh/IBM on 11/14/2005 12:54 PM -----

Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

11/11/2005 06:07 PM

To

,


cc

Subject

[wsrf] WSDM requirements
for WSRF

Hi, 

The WSDM TC would like to discuss the following requirement for the WS-RMD
specification with WS-RF. 

WSDM needs an any extension point back in the WS-RMD document. 

   - WSDM needs the ability to add management metadata on non-property
components, for example on relationships, notifications, and of course
operations 

   - We also anticipate that there will be a need to describe metadata
on other kinds of aspects of ws-resources,  like associated policies
or agreements. 

   - We believe that if WS-RMD did not allow extension then other
communities/specs that have metadata requirements will invent thier own
metadata documents and we'll end up with sets of overlapping and disconnected
metadata documents about the same ws-resource.  We do not think that
WSDM should define thier own metadata document format to cover all other
aspects of WS-Resource metadata EXCEPT properties. 

Just as a heads up, WSDM is continuing to discuss other requirements for
WS-RMD may make additional requirements. 

We would like to discuss this extension point requirement at the Monday
November 14th WS-RF  meeting.   

Thanks,

Heather Kreger

WSDM TC Cochair



919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
Next in thread → Next in month →