← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsrp-webservice] [wsrp-webservices] what to consider for binar yat tachment

From
Andre Kramer <>
Date
2003-12-10T15:50:42+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsrp-webservice] [wsrp-webservices] what to consider for binar yat tachment
Title: RE: [wsrp-webservice] [wsrp-webservices] what to consider for binar yat tachment

thanks for that, Subbu. I was delayed by another commitment today and failed to open the wsrp SC call on time.

apologies,

Andre

-----Original Message-----

From: Subbu Allamaraju [mailto:]

Sent: 10 December 2003 14:26

To: 

Subject: Re: [wsrp-webservice] [wsrp-webservices] what to consider for

binar yat tachment

When I add the extra element, our schema compiler fails with the 

following error

wsrp_v1_types.xsd:502: error: Content model violates the unique particle 

attribution rule

Regards,

Subbu

Andre Kramer said the following on 11/26/2003 08:20 AM:

> Only Subbu called in this week and he volunteered to test the extra 

> schema file with BEA and Apache stacks - thanks.

>  

> regards (and a good Holiday to US folks),

> Andre

> 

>     -----Original Message-----

>     *From:* Andre Kramer [mailto:]

>     *Sent:* 24 November 2003 14:54

>     *To:* 

>     *Subject:* [wsrp-webservice] [wsrp-webservices] what to consider for

>     binary at tachment

> 

>     One of the things that came up in the last call was the list for

>     candidates for special handling as binary or specially encoded data.

>     Here is a first attempt of such a list for this Wednesday' conf

>     call. Because of this week's US Holiday, I expect we will just have

>     a quick call to touch on this and the extra schema types, elements &

>     namespace issue.

> 

>     regards,

>     Andre

> 

>     -------------------

> 

>     Elements that are potentially large or binary (or character or

>     otherwise encoded), or would allow for a compact domain specific

>     serialization, that could benefit from attachment (H - high benefit,

>     M - medium, L - low):

> 

>     MarkupContext.markupString (H)

>     MarkupContext.markupBinary (H)

>     UploadContext.uploadData (H)

>     Property.value - could be large or binary (portlet and registration

>     property data) (H)

> 

>     ResourceList - could be large or in diverse character sets. May

>     allow for JAR (Java ARchive) or other representation to be used for

>     serialization. (M)

> 

>     RegistrationState.registrationState - could be cached on consumer

>     and uploaded at intervals (pushed back later) if large. (M)

> 

>     RuntimeContext.templates - though cached in session (could vary per

>     call or be large) (M)

>     PortletContext.portletState - could be cached on consumer and

>     uploaded at intervals (pushed back later) if large. (M)

>     UserContext.userProfile - though cached it can be large or domain

>     specific (e.g. biometric data) (M)

> 

>     ModelType - could be domain specific. (L)

>     ClientData.extensions? - could be large capability model (L)

>     UserContext.extensions? (L)

>     fault.details? (L)

> 

> 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-webservice/members/leave_workgroup.php.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →