Yup. Sorry. I'll update the list (remove the "we are postponing..."
part). Note however that a "tentative proposal" email was also
sent.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tamari, Yossi
[mailto:]
Sent: Thu, September 26, 2002
20:32
To: 'Gil Tayar'
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia]
[I#6]Update: Is groupId required?
Hi
Gil,
I
think you got a little confused. Regarding this we said we will vote next week
to remove groupId from the spec.
It
was regarding the isRefresh that we said we will defer until after the JSR
meeting.
Yossi.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, September 26,
2002 8:29 PM
To:
Subject:
[wsrp-wsia] [I#6]Update: Is groupId required?
Owner:
Michael Freedman
Title:
Is groupId required?
Description:
Since
we now have initEnvironment, which is the solution for shared sessions, do
we now need groupId, which was also defined as a mechanism for group
sessions.
We are postponing this until we hear some more information from
the JSR-168 liason people.
