[wsrp-wsia] e-Mail Vote on Issue #59 (refined)

Dear WSRP and WSIA TC Members,

I put up the following issue for an e-mail vote (ending 1 week after this
notice goes out) - the following summarizes the discussion for this issue
(thanks Rich !)

Issue #59 (refined) - Keep the wsdlURL field in ServiceDescription?

Arguments in favor:
 - If this was an infrastructural portType (has that flavor), this would be
THE required field.
 - This provides a standardized place to produce a dynamic WSDL that
reflects the Consumer's registration.

Arguments against:
 - Since we are above the infrastructural level, this information has to be
already known in order to invoke getServiceDescription().
 - If the infrastructural level provides such information in the future, it
will be redundant and likely incompatible
 - Not critical for v1.0 ... can be an extension for those wishing to
provide the dynamic WSDL concept.
 - Assumes the signature will not change for future versions of the spec.
 - Belongs as part of the discovery process rather than as part of the
service.

Best regards,

Thomas

Thomas Schaeck
Chairman OASIS WSRP TC