RE: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces] Discussion o utline for face2face

I think if we take Mark's suggestion to change the evaluation criteria from
"Privacy" to "Security", that should cover the message integrity case you
bring up.

Alan


-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed, Zahid [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:26 PM
To: 'Cassidy, Mark'; 'Alan Kropp'; ;
; ''
Subject: RE: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia joint
inter faces] Discussion o utline for face2face


I like the attached requirement characterizations.
 
One suggestion, have we considered authentication and trust requirements:
 
- inter-component communication and invocations by trusted peers;  
 
thanks,
Zahid Ahmed

-----Original Message-----
From: Cassidy, Mark [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:20 PM
To: 'Alan Kropp'; ;
; ''
Subject: RE: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia joint inter
faces] Discussion o utline for face2face


I suggest you use 'Security' instead of 'Privacy' as the evaluation
criteria:
 
Security:  Requirements ensuring :
- integrity of information passed between components of the system
- confidentiality of private information passed between components of the
system
- robustness of the system against replay, denial of service, and other
similar forms of attack
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Kropp [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 5:13 PM
To: ; 
Subject: [wsia-comment] [wsrp][wsia][interfaces][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces]
Discussion o utline for face2face


As we discussed in the last joint interfaces call, here is my draft of the
outline to guide the discussions during next week's f2f on interface issues.