Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [wsrp] [errata #13] Extensions IDL

From
Rich Thompson <>
Date
2003-04-30T16:58:34+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [wsrp] [errata #13] Extensions IDL
The WSDL SC had changed this and apparently
I failed to update the spec to match. The basic reasoning was that we didn't
need an array of arrays. If appropriate, an extension type can always be
a root element for a complexType ... namely, anything can be represented
without the any field being an array.

Rich Thompson

Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS

04/30/2003 01:00 PM
        

        To:
       

        cc:
       

        Subject:
       [wsrp] [errata #13] Extensions IDL

Comment: 

13. 4/30/03 (Yossi Tamari) 

Change definition of the Extension type: 

Document: Spec 

Section: 5.1.1 

Old Text: [O] Object                
any[] 

New Text: [O] Object                
any 

Reason: The definition here is of a single Extension field, not of the
array. Anywhere else in the spec we use an array of Extension ([O] Extension
extensions[]). This also matches our wsrp_v1_types.xsd better.
Next in thread → Next in month →