← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

WS-Security 1.0 Support

From
Tony Opatha <>
Date
2003-09-26T19:13:49+00:00
ID
Thread
WS-Security 1.0 Support
Kindly please answer following question.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

1) WS-Security v.1.0 Support

Which vendors are currently supporting the WS-Security v.1.0

specification such that they support the final version of the WS-Security

namespace (assuming this is the frozen namespace v.1.0):

    xmlns:wsse=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/secext

     xmlns:wsu=htp://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/utility

 

2) In particular is IBM WSDK 5.1, Microsoft .NET1.1/ WSE supporting or will support

within Q4 '03 the latest namespace of WS-Security?

 

3) Namespace Mismatch Issue

The reason for above question is obviously concern for SOAP Message Security

interoperability is somewhat depdendent on the namespace assumption used (i.e.,

WS-Security XSD schema specs) used in a SOAP client and a SOAP service. If

the SOAP client uses e.g., uses an older implementation of WS-Security (e.g., 

Verisign TSIK v. 1.7) that has

following namespace:  

  

         xmlns:wsse=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2002/07/secext

         xmlns:wsu=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2002/07/utility

 

then obviously such a client and service interaction will fail due to

security non-interoperability.

 

4) Rationale for WS-Security Versioning Scheme

Lastly why did the OASIS WSS TC decide to embed explicitly

the WS-Security (in particular the SOAP Message Security 

Specification) release date into the XML namespace for its XSD

schema specification? Such version management practice is

bound to cause interoperability challenges that could have easily

been avoidable with expressing the versioning information as an

XML attribute (e.g., <xsd:attribute name="version" type="xsd:string">)

which is consistent with the way the OASIS SSTC/SAML TC

dealt with security schema specification evolution issue.

 

Even if OASIS WSS TC does make the change w.r.t. #4, I'm

curious how to deal with #3 unless vendors will support #1 

ASAP.

 

        

Do you Yahoo!?

The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →