← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[wss] Minutes for WSS TC meeting on October 8th

From
Kelvin Lawrence <>
Date
2002-10-16T19:49:32+00:00
ID
Thread
[wss] Minutes for WSS TC meeting on October 8th
Here are the minutes from our most recent
call. As always, please review and post corrections to the list so we can
approve (quickly) at our next call.

Thanks

Kelvin & Chris

Web Services Security TC Meeting Minutes

October 8th , 2002

Minutes taken by Bob Morgan.

Agenda (as posted prior to the meeting)

1.    Introductions
& welcome 

2.
     Roll
call 

3.
     Reading
of the minutes of our previous meeting
(9/24) 

4.
     Brief
report from the naming sub-committee 

5.
     Brief report from
the Use Cases sub-committee

6.
     Update on the SJC
charter 

7.
     Progress
report from the editors

8.
     Review
of documents

9.
     Review
and status of actions and issues 

10.
 Any other business

11.
 Adjournment

The meeting began at 7:05am Pacific Time

Roll call was taken.

Those present

Voting Members

         
               
                 
       

First        
        Last        
              Company  
              

Don        
        Adams        
        TIBCO        
        

Zahid        
        Ahmed        
        Commerce One        
        

Steve        
        Anderson        
        OpenNetwork        
        

Conor        
        Cahill        
        AOL        
        

Paul        
        Cotton        
        Microsoft        
        

Martijn        
de Boer                
SAP                

Thomas        
DeMartini                
ContentGuard                

Yassir        
Elley                
Sun Microsystems              
  

Jeremy        
Epstein                
webMethods                

Don        
        Flinn        
        Quadrasis        

Peter          Furniss
               
Choreology

Eric        
        Gravengaard        
Reactivity                

Sam        
        Greenblatt        
        Computer Associates      
          

Phillip        
Hallam-Baker         Verisign    
            

Geff        
        Hanoian        
        Overxeer        
        

Jeff        
        Hodges        
        Sun Microsystems      
          

Merlin        
Hughes                
Baltimore Technologies            
    

Chris        
        Kaler        
        Microsoft        
        

Charles        
Knouse                
Oblix                

Yutaka        
Kudo                  
     Hitachi        
        

Kelvin        
Lawrence                
IBM                

Hal        
        Lockhart        
        Entegrity Solutions      
          

Monica        
Martin                
Drake Certivo, Inc.              
  

Ronald        
Monzillo                
Sun Microsystems              
  

Bob        
        Morgan        
        (individual)        
        

Tim        
        Moses        
        Entrust        
        

Joel        
        Munter        
        Intel        
        

Anthony        
Nadalin                
IBM                

Nataraj        
Nagaratnam                
IBM                

Toshihiro        
Nishimura                
Fujitsu                

Rob        
        Philpott        
        RSA Security        
        

William        
Pope                
        Choreology        
        

Irving        
Reid                
        Baltimore Technologies    
            

Peter        
        Rostin        
        RSA Security        
        

Krishna        
Sankar                
Cisco                

Jerry        
        Schwarz        
        Oracle        
        

Shawn        
        Sharp        
        Cyclone Commerce      
          

John        
        Shewchuk        
        Microsoft        
        

Frank        
        Siebenlist        
        Argonne National Lab    
            

Andre        
        Srinivasan        
        E2open        
        

Gene        
        Thurston        
        AmberPoint        
        

Steve        
        Trythall        
        Sonic Software      
          

Sirish        
Vepa                
        Sybase        

Ganesh        
 Vaideeswaran         Documentum
        

Rob        
        Weltman        
        Netscape/AOL        
        

Pete        
        Wenzel        
        SeeBeyond        
        

         
               
                 
       

         
               
                 
       

Prospective Members      
               
               
            

Maryann        
Hondo                
IBM                

Prateek        
Mishra                
Netegrity                

Jason        
        Rouault        
        HP        
        

William        
Cox                  
    BEA            
    

Anne        
        Manes        
        (individual)        
        

Ron        
        Moritz        
      Computer Associates        
        

Toufic        
Boubez                
Level-7                

Guillermo        
Lao                  
    ContentGuard        
        

John        
        Weiland        
        Navy        
        

         
               
                 
       

         
               
                 
       

Observers        
                 
               
        

Tim        
        Hall        
               
Talking Blocks              
 

Chair’s note: As a result of this
meeting, several of the prospective members, having now attended 3 meetings,
became voting members. We will update the records and publish new information
to the list and the web page.

Objections to last minutes as sent out?

KL:  those who attended who aren't on
the list will be added with this correction,  minutes unanimously
accepted

Report from naming subcommittee

Rob Philpott:  results of discussion
submitted to list   several recommendations made for doc names

  "web services security:"
prefix for all doc names

    followed by more specific per-doc
name

  several options for current "core"
doc

  others to be labelled as "profiles"
for Kerberos etc

Hal Lockhart:  some comments, but no
alternatives proposed

  so seems we should proceed to vote?

Jerry Schwartz:

  concern that people think we're doing
all of "WS security"

  so, removing the ":" in
the name would help ...

Chris K:  OK

  chairs will encourage review and comment,
with vote on next concall

Report from use cases subcommittee?

Zahid A:  no meetings held

KL:  Phil Griffin had sent invitation
to chairs to join OASIS SJC

Hal:  SJC is clarifying charter, always
intended that WSS should join

  some confusion about which other committees
should join

KL:  so should be no more contention,
chairs will follow up

Hal:  chairs should join next SJC concall

Report from document editors

Tony Nadalin:  just four comments

  editors pulling out comments for inclusion
in their docs

Ron Monzillo:  agreed with Prateek's
comments, not yet included

Jeff Hodges:  will we have document
repository?

KL:  yes, website coord has been busy,
but will do that

Review of documents

CK:  a few comments on list

  should this be interpreted as consent
or inattention?

various:  give a deadline

KL:  useful deadline is to go to committee
draft

CK:  OK, please raise issues by one
week from today

  with intent to have vote on committee
spec in two weeks

Hal:  various process steps:

  public review, attestation of "use"
by three companies

  need to define "use" since
OASIS guidelines are minimal

RM:  need to consider impact of existing
issues

Bill Cox:

  problem is that people don't read
docs until they look "ready"

  so how about longer deadlines

CK:  part of schedule is scheduling
F2F, November looking unlikely

various:  is F2F during comment period
a bad idea?

Review of issues

John Shewchuk:  sent out revised issues
list

issue #1:  alternative methods of sig/enc,
Zahid is owner

ZA:  will produce proposal for alternative
this week

Q:  is this proposal for XML sig/end
or alternative?

ZA:  no, not alternative, just how to
use XML DS/E

Prateek:  interesting use case was proposed
by Monica

discussion:

  should consider extensibility even
if no specific alternatives

    are fully specified at this
time

  since our docs will likely not be
perfect for all time

  current doc says "MUST XML enc/sig,
but MAY others", is that OK?

  objection:  should make alternative
methods in XML the problem

    of XML sig/enc committees,
not ours

  but question is about use of existing
non-XML methods, eg S/MIME

JS:  proposal:  continue to say
XML enc/sig MUST be implemented

  specify how to add others as profiles
if desired

RM:  think of these mechanisms as "proofs"

  considering high-level abstraction
indicating what is being proved

  eg, how is knowledge of time-stamp
incorporated?

  maybe need is to indicate "type"
of signature

  eg, digested username/password token
is a kind of proof,

someone:  all signature can ever do
is demonstrate knowledge of key

discussion:

  does this permit anything to be a
profile?

  what about combination of profiles?

  as long as parties agree, you can
combine them ...

PHB:  only likely extension would be
use of the

  many sign&encrypt protocols

  PKCS7 would likely better be done
with separate header

JerryS:  does more extensibility imply
need for negotiation?

CK:  we already have several types,
imply out-of-band agreements

JerryS:  WS-I wants to

BM:  how can we know whether extensibility
will work without a

  concrete example?

CK:  Phil Griffin's proposal is first
step in that direction

Paul Cotton:  having extensibility doesn't
change compliance

  with core stuff, as long as core isn't
redefined by it

MOTION:

  conformant implementations must support
XML sig/enc

    and MAY support additional
mechanisms

    and editors are so directed

  motion is seconded

Hal:  does this imply that we might
change spec to eliminate barriers

  to such extensibility?  eg in
consideration of PG's proposal?

  discussion:  yes

comment:

  please check with Phil Griffin whether
this addresses his issue

  KL:  yes, so notes

motion unanimously carried

issue #3:  indicate token semantics

Hal:  close to closure, but recent discussion
is departure

  will send summary/proposal to list
within two days

  also some important security considerations
go along with this

issue #4:  why is token not child of
keyinfo?

PHB:  have to do Kerberos as token

  relates to issue #5 too

CK:  so let's combine issues 4 and 5

  and note that resolution of #3 must
be consistent with that

issue #6:  submission of roadmap

KL:  modifications to footers made

BM:  just a matter of putting it in
committee repository?

KL:  this requires substantial legal
clearance

  surely don't want to put every referenced
doc in our repository?

JShewchuk:  so, doc owners will obtain
fixed URL

remains open

issue #9:

instruct use-case authors to consider whether
or not they need this doc

remains open

issue #10:  interop fest

postponed until closer to finished docs

issue #13:  element ordering

has proposal been made?  JerryS:  not
yet

  may just be clarity issue

editors are instructed to clarify wording
under consideration

remains open

issue #14:  recipient should authenticate

this is specific to SAML profile?  yes

RM:  general statement is that recipient
should validate claim

  may need to be said in core doc

RM will propose modification to doc

remains open

issue #15:  use of term "role"
in spec

Prateek:  need to reference that Role
is defined in SOAP 1.2

  and when using SOAP 1.1 this means
"actor"

editors directed to make text along this
line

remains open

issue #16:  replay

Prateek:  really about nature of example,
will raise new issue

closed

issue #17:  question about lines 1139-1141
of core

clarification needed by editors about meaning
of these lines

remains open

issue #18:  1224-1226 reference "send
time" that is undefined

CK:  intent is to calculate delay time,
no attribute implied

no change to text needed

closed

issue #19:  special case of username/password

RM:  useful to unify notion of proof

  to achieve semantic model of proof
and validation

  related to proposal to indicate semantics
in label

  also covers issues 23 and 24

RM directed to participate with PHB, TN in
resolution of

  labelling and POP

remains open

issue #20:  security token propagation

editors need to clarify intention regarding
propagation

remains open

F2F discussion

KL:  early November is a problem due
to chair availability. OASIS conference is week of 12/8 in Baltimore ,
W3C AC meeting is week of 11/18, religious holidays first week of December.
Looking at 2-day meeting
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →