← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[wss] Minutes for WSS TC meeting on October 8th
Here are the minutes from our most recent call. As always, please review and post corrections to the list so we can approve (quickly) at our next call. Thanks Kelvin & Chris Web Services Security TC Meeting Minutes October 8th , 2002 Minutes taken by Bob Morgan. Agenda (as posted prior to the meeting) 1. Introductions & welcome 2. Roll call 3. Reading of the minutes of our previous meeting (9/24) 4. Brief report from the naming sub-committee 5. Brief report from the Use Cases sub-committee 6. Update on the SJC charter 7. Progress report from the editors 8. Review of documents 9. Review and status of actions and issues 10. Any other business 11. Adjournment The meeting began at 7:05am Pacific Time Roll call was taken. Those present Voting Members First Last Company Don Adams TIBCO Zahid Ahmed Commerce One Steve Anderson OpenNetwork Conor Cahill AOL Paul Cotton Microsoft Martijn de Boer SAP Thomas DeMartini ContentGuard Yassir Elley Sun Microsystems Jeremy Epstein webMethods Don Flinn Quadrasis Peter Furniss Choreology Eric Gravengaard Reactivity Sam Greenblatt Computer Associates Phillip Hallam-Baker Verisign Geff Hanoian Overxeer Jeff Hodges Sun Microsystems Merlin Hughes Baltimore Technologies Chris Kaler Microsoft Charles Knouse Oblix Yutaka Kudo Hitachi Kelvin Lawrence IBM Hal Lockhart Entegrity Solutions Monica Martin Drake Certivo, Inc. Ronald Monzillo Sun Microsystems Bob Morgan (individual) Tim Moses Entrust Joel Munter Intel Anthony Nadalin IBM Nataraj Nagaratnam IBM Toshihiro Nishimura Fujitsu Rob Philpott RSA Security William Pope Choreology Irving Reid Baltimore Technologies Peter Rostin RSA Security Krishna Sankar Cisco Jerry Schwarz Oracle Shawn Sharp Cyclone Commerce John Shewchuk Microsoft Frank Siebenlist Argonne National Lab Andre Srinivasan E2open Gene Thurston AmberPoint Steve Trythall Sonic Software Sirish Vepa Sybase Ganesh Vaideeswaran Documentum Rob Weltman Netscape/AOL Pete Wenzel SeeBeyond Prospective Members Maryann Hondo IBM Prateek Mishra Netegrity Jason Rouault HP William Cox BEA Anne Manes (individual) Ron Moritz Computer Associates Toufic Boubez Level-7 Guillermo Lao ContentGuard John Weiland Navy Observers Tim Hall Talking Blocks Chair’s note: As a result of this meeting, several of the prospective members, having now attended 3 meetings, became voting members. We will update the records and publish new information to the list and the web page. Objections to last minutes as sent out? KL: those who attended who aren't on the list will be added with this correction, minutes unanimously accepted Report from naming subcommittee Rob Philpott: results of discussion submitted to list several recommendations made for doc names "web services security:" prefix for all doc names followed by more specific per-doc name several options for current "core" doc others to be labelled as "profiles" for Kerberos etc Hal Lockhart: some comments, but no alternatives proposed so seems we should proceed to vote? Jerry Schwartz: concern that people think we're doing all of "WS security" so, removing the ":" in the name would help ... Chris K: OK chairs will encourage review and comment, with vote on next concall Report from use cases subcommittee? Zahid A: no meetings held KL: Phil Griffin had sent invitation to chairs to join OASIS SJC Hal: SJC is clarifying charter, always intended that WSS should join some confusion about which other committees should join KL: so should be no more contention, chairs will follow up Hal: chairs should join next SJC concall Report from document editors Tony Nadalin: just four comments editors pulling out comments for inclusion in their docs Ron Monzillo: agreed with Prateek's comments, not yet included Jeff Hodges: will we have document repository? KL: yes, website coord has been busy, but will do that Review of documents CK: a few comments on list should this be interpreted as consent or inattention? various: give a deadline KL: useful deadline is to go to committee draft CK: OK, please raise issues by one week from today with intent to have vote on committee spec in two weeks Hal: various process steps: public review, attestation of "use" by three companies need to define "use" since OASIS guidelines are minimal RM: need to consider impact of existing issues Bill Cox: problem is that people don't read docs until they look "ready" so how about longer deadlines CK: part of schedule is scheduling F2F, November looking unlikely various: is F2F during comment period a bad idea? Review of issues John Shewchuk: sent out revised issues list issue #1: alternative methods of sig/enc, Zahid is owner ZA: will produce proposal for alternative this week Q: is this proposal for XML sig/end or alternative? ZA: no, not alternative, just how to use XML DS/E Prateek: interesting use case was proposed by Monica discussion: should consider extensibility even if no specific alternatives are fully specified at this time since our docs will likely not be perfect for all time current doc says "MUST XML enc/sig, but MAY others", is that OK? objection: should make alternative methods in XML the problem of XML sig/enc committees, not ours but question is about use of existing non-XML methods, eg S/MIME JS: proposal: continue to say XML enc/sig MUST be implemented specify how to add others as profiles if desired RM: think of these mechanisms as "proofs" considering high-level abstraction indicating what is being proved eg, how is knowledge of time-stamp incorporated? maybe need is to indicate "type" of signature eg, digested username/password token is a kind of proof, someone: all signature can ever do is demonstrate knowledge of key discussion: does this permit anything to be a profile? what about combination of profiles? as long as parties agree, you can combine them ... PHB: only likely extension would be use of the many sign&encrypt protocols PKCS7 would likely better be done with separate header JerryS: does more extensibility imply need for negotiation? CK: we already have several types, imply out-of-band agreements JerryS: WS-I wants to BM: how can we know whether extensibility will work without a concrete example? CK: Phil Griffin's proposal is first step in that direction Paul Cotton: having extensibility doesn't change compliance with core stuff, as long as core isn't redefined by it MOTION: conformant implementations must support XML sig/enc and MAY support additional mechanisms and editors are so directed motion is seconded Hal: does this imply that we might change spec to eliminate barriers to such extensibility? eg in consideration of PG's proposal? discussion: yes comment: please check with Phil Griffin whether this addresses his issue KL: yes, so notes motion unanimously carried issue #3: indicate token semantics Hal: close to closure, but recent discussion is departure will send summary/proposal to list within two days also some important security considerations go along with this issue #4: why is token not child of keyinfo? PHB: have to do Kerberos as token relates to issue #5 too CK: so let's combine issues 4 and 5 and note that resolution of #3 must be consistent with that issue #6: submission of roadmap KL: modifications to footers made BM: just a matter of putting it in committee repository? KL: this requires substantial legal clearance surely don't want to put every referenced doc in our repository? JShewchuk: so, doc owners will obtain fixed URL remains open issue #9: instruct use-case authors to consider whether or not they need this doc remains open issue #10: interop fest postponed until closer to finished docs issue #13: element ordering has proposal been made? JerryS: not yet may just be clarity issue editors are instructed to clarify wording under consideration remains open issue #14: recipient should authenticate this is specific to SAML profile? yes RM: general statement is that recipient should validate claim may need to be said in core doc RM will propose modification to doc remains open issue #15: use of term "role" in spec Prateek: need to reference that Role is defined in SOAP 1.2 and when using SOAP 1.1 this means "actor" editors directed to make text along this line remains open issue #16: replay Prateek: really about nature of example, will raise new issue closed issue #17: question about lines 1139-1141 of core clarification needed by editors about meaning of these lines remains open issue #18: 1224-1226 reference "send time" that is undefined CK: intent is to calculate delay time, no attribute implied no change to text needed closed issue #19: special case of username/password RM: useful to unify notion of proof to achieve semantic model of proof and validation related to proposal to indicate semantics in label also covers issues 23 and 24 RM directed to participate with PHB, TN in resolution of labelling and POP remains open issue #20: security token propagation editors need to clarify intention regarding propagation remains open F2F discussion KL: early November is a problem due to chair availability. OASIS conference is week of 12/8 in Baltimore , W3C AC meeting is week of 11/18, religious holidays first week of December. Looking at 2-day meeting
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →