Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call
Hello Ganesh, I only just saw your mail - I hope you were able to find the number. In general if you ever need to find details of a pending meeting you can find it at the WSS TC web page which is located at [1]. I try to keep the web page up to date. Normally we also post the number with the agenda but this time we took a little longer than normal to setup the dial in number so the minutes went out without a number and the number was sent in a follow on mail. [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss/ Cheers Kelvin Ganesh Vaideeswaran <> 01/13/2003 10:59 PM To Kelvin Lawrence/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, cc Subject RE: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call Sorry for the blast, but can someone from the list kindly forward me the phone number and access code to conference in? Thanks, -Ganesh -----Original Message----- From: Kelvin Lawrence [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 5:58 PM To: Subject: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call Here is the agenda for the WSS TC call on January 14th. I do not have a call-in number yet as we currently have no sponsor for the call. Please could someone volunteer to host the call ? 1. Call to order, roll call 2. Reading of minutes of last meeting (Dec 17th) 3. QoP discussion and vote (hopefully much discussion will have already happened in e-mail) 4. Vote on "core" spec name based on feedback from naming sub-committee 5. Discussion of spec status - do we have an interop draft yet ? 6. Other business As agreed last year the first order of business after we approve the minutes of the prior call is the QoP motion. Based on what I heard at the end of the last call I suspect there is going to be a lot of discussion before we can get to a vote. In order to expedite things I encourage people to use the e-mail list to jump start that discussion. While I agree this is an important issue, we need to try and make a decision and then get back to a solid focus on the primary job of our charter which is to get the WS-Security spec done. Also, we would like to try and do the official vote on the "core" spec name on this call. I would appreciate it if Rob or one of the other members of the naming sub-committee could post a mail summarizing the results of the e-mail poll. Rob gave us a review at the Baltimore but we need to now do the official vote. Thanks in advance. I look forward to a productive call next Tuesday. Cheers Kelvin
Next in thread →
Next in month →