Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call

From
Kelvin Lawrence <>
Date
2003-01-14T18:39:27+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call
Hello Ganesh, I only just saw your mail
- I hope you were able to find the number. In general if you ever need
to find details of a pending meeting you can find it at the WSS TC web
page which is located at [1]. I try to keep the web page up to date. Normally
we also post the number with the agenda but this time we took a little
longer than normal to setup the dial in number so the minutes went out
without a number and the number was sent in a follow on mail.

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss/

Cheers

Kelvin

Ganesh Vaideeswaran <>

01/13/2003 10:59 PM

To

Kelvin Lawrence/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,


cc

Subject

RE: [wss] Agenda for Jan
14th WSS TC call

 

Sorry for the blast, but can
someone from the list kindly forward me the phone number and access code
to conference in?

 

Thanks,

-Ganesh 

-----Original Message-----

From: Kelvin Lawrence [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 5:58 PM

To: 

Subject: [wss] Agenda for Jan 14th WSS TC call

 

Here is the agenda for the WSS TC call on January 14th.

I do not have a call-in number yet as we currently have no sponsor for
the call. Please could someone volunteer to host the call ?

1. Call to order, roll call

2. Reading of minutes of last meeting (Dec 17th)

3. QoP discussion and vote (hopefully much discussion will have already
happened in e-mail) 

4. Vote on "core" spec name based on feedback from naming sub-committee

5. Discussion of spec status - do we have an interop draft yet ?

6. Other business 

As agreed last year the first order of business after we approve the minutes
of the prior call is the QoP motion. Based on what I heard at the end of
the last call I suspect there is going to be a lot of discussion before
we can get to a vote. In order to expedite things I encourage people to
use the e-mail list to jump start that discussion. While I agree this is
an important issue, we need to try and make a decision and then get back
to a solid focus on the primary job of our charter which is to get the
WS-Security spec done. 

Also, we would like to try and do the official vote on the "core"
spec name on this call. I would appreciate it if Rob or one of the other
members of the naming sub-committee could post a mail summarizing the results
of the e-mail poll. Rob gave us a review at the Baltimore but we need to
now do the official vote. Thanks in advance.

I look forward to a productive call next Tuesday.

Cheers

Kelvin
Next in thread → Next in month →