RE: [wss] Proposed interop logistics

From
"Ial Mockhart"
Date
2003-05-30T21:29:33+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wss] Proposed interop logistics
My 
list of things we need:

 

Ethernet ports how many? (3-4) per company? is that too many - I assume 
RJ45, not wireless

Static 
IP addresses - might be easier to give each company 10 or 
so

DNS ? 
are we going to omit the use of DNS?

We 
need the two X.509 certificates

What 
about clock synchronization? - set them manually?

Proposed list of usernames and passwords:

 

Chris 
- sirhC

Kelvin 
- nivleK

Phill 
- llihP

Tony - 
ynoT

Ron - 
noR

John - 
nhoJ

Hal - 
laH

Jerry 
- yrreJ

Steve 
- evetS

Eric - 
cirE

 

I 
think it would be a better use of time to pair off and test in pairs, assuming 
most people have clients and servers. We can informally switch off as people are 
ready. We can still use the matrix to track our progress as you suggest. 

 

The 
experience at the SAML interop suggests that implementations may stop working as 
a result of other fixes. I suggest, time permitting, that once we believe 
everybody interops with everybody else, we do a code freeze and a final run thru 
the matrix. That way everybody can take home code that is known to 
work.

 

Hal

 

 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kaler 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:17 
  AM
To: WSS
Subject: [wss] Proposed interop 
  logistics

  

  
Here is a proposal – what do 
  people think?

  
 

  
1. We will have Ethernet for 
  everyone testing.  

  
2. Everyone will be assigned a 
  static IP address (192.168.1.*)

  
3. We construct a matrix for each 
  of the interop tests of who has client and server 
  code

  
4. For each test we sequentially 
  use each server implementation

  
            
  a. Put the server IP address on the wall

  
            
  b. Test from each client

  
            
  c. Debug/record results

  
 

  
Thoughts?

  
Chris