RE: [wss] Names of Contributors for the spec(s)

I like 
this approach.  R/ John

 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Moses 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:05 
  AM
To: 
Subject: RE: [wss] Names 
  of Contributors for the spec(s)

  
Kelvin - In XACML we took a different approach.  
  We listed committee members who were in "good standing" on the release date of 
  the specification on the front page.  And we listed anyone who had ever 
  been a committee member in an Appendix.  I like this approach because it 
  is totally objective; it avoids the need to judge whether or not someone 
  made a "main" contributor.  So, I ask that people give some consideration 
  to this approach.  All the best.  Tim.

  
    
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelvin Lawrence 
    [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:51 
    AM
To: 
Subject: [wss] Names of 
    Contributors for the spec(s)

At the F2F it was suggested that I should make this posting to the 
    list to start the process of collecting the names of folks who should be 
    listed as contributors to the spec. OASIS specs typically list the editors 
    and main contributors on the front page and then list the names of all the 
    voting members of the TC at time of spec publication in an appendix. A good 
    example of how this is done can be seen by looking at the recently published 
    SAML specification [1]. 

If you 
    feel you should be listed as a "contributor" please send mail to the list in 
    response to this message. Thanks. 

[1] 
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/2284/sstc-saml-glossary-1.1-cs-01.pdf 
    

Cheers
Kelvin