Thanks for all the hard work Hal -- here are a couple of
comments/questions:
1. Shouldn't <KeyName> be in the ds namespace not the xenc namespace?
2. The schema definition for ticketType does not look right to me:
<complexType name="ticketType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="text" type="xsd:string" nillable="true"/>
<xsd:element name="ticket" type="tns:ticketType" minOccurs="0"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute ref="wsu:Id" use="optional"/>
</complexType>
It looks like the type is being referenced inside of its definition --
is that intentional or is this a cut/paste error? Were you trying to
just add an ID to a string value? If so, you might try the following:
<complexType name="ticketType">
<xsd:simpleContent>
<xsd:extension base="xsd:string">
<xsd:attribute ref="wsu:Id" />
</xsd:extension>
</xsd:simpleContent>
</complexType>
3. It looks like we have the same [missing]
elementFormDefault="qualified" issue we had with the first interop WSDL.
That is, making sure every element is a qualified name (not the empty
namespace).
4. We need to agree on a session key for scenario #4 -- attached is a
proposal, what do people think?
5. We also need to agree on the second certificate used for scenario #4
-- how about if we just use the WSSTest2 certificate from the first
interop test?
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:22 PM
To:
Subject: [wss] Interop2 Draft 5
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup
.php.
