RE: [wss] proposed terminology addition to STP - impersonation

From
Don Flinn <>
Date
2004-03-11T02:04:29+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wss] proposed terminology addition to STP - impersonation


Tony

 

I 
don't see any definition of impersonation in the SAML Glossary.  But more 
to the point, the reason I asked Ron to include a definition of impersonation 
was that at the time he and Rich Levinson were defining a protocol in the 
SAML profile, which used impersonation .  This I felt would lead users to 
assume that using the impersonation capability would be equivalent to 
using delegation, since the difference between the two is subtle to the 
uninitiated.  In fact, the two are quite different in that in 
delegation the delegator should be able to say who can act as delegatees 
for him and to limit what activities the delegatees can perform in the 
delegator's name.  Impersonation says that anyone can do anything in the 
name of the impersonated entity.  However, since this addition to the 
specification is not being incorporated, I withdraw my 
request.

 

Don

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:56 
  PM
To: ''
Subject: Re: [wss] 
  proposed terminology addition to STP - impersonation

  
Can't you just put a reference to the SAML Glossary in the appendix and 
  thus not define duplicate terms ?

Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | 
  cell 512.289.4122
" 
  src="gif00020.gif" width=16>Ron Monzillo 
  <>

  
    
    

      
        
          
            
              Ron Monzillo 
                <> 
                
03/09/2004 09:15 AM

      
        
          
          

            

              
To

            
"''" 
              <>

          

            

              
cc

            

          

            

              
Subject

            
[wss] proposed terminology addition to STP - 
              impersonation

        
          
          

            
            

Donn 
  Flinn asked that a definition of impersonation be added to the
terminology 
  section of the SAML token profile.

I propose that the following line be 
  added (at about line 183).

Impersonation – occurs when the attesting 
  entity is not the subject of 
the assertions.

where attesting entity 
  is already defined as:

175 Attesting Entity – the entity that provides 
  the confirmation 
evidence that will be
used to establish the 
  correspondence between the subject of SAML subject
statements (in SAML 
  assertions) and SOAP message content.

To unsubscribe from this 
  mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.