RE: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote

From
Abbie Barbir <>
Date
2004-04-05T15:23:29+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote
Title: Message

+1

 

Abbie

 

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:21 
  AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [wss] about 
  Hitachi's negative vote

  
>Line 599 says that the fragment URL is relative the the URL of the 
  
>document.  Where is the URL of the document defined?  For 
  example, is it 
>on line 9, line 10, or somewhere else?

I 
  don't think that this ambiguous at all as it states what a fragment URL is 
  (we already agreed to the URI of the documents), but it may need an example 
  and I think that is fine to do in an errata.

So my suggestion 
  is that we take Mike's proposal and insert in errata.

Anthony 
  Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 
512.289.4122