Re: [wss] Attachments Profile

From
Ramana Turlapati <>
Date
2004-06-15T16:54:19+00:00
ID
0ea501c452f9$c5af4970$
Thread
Re: [wss] Attachments Profile
Couple of comments:

 

1. The document specifies that "Mime part signature 
transform must canonicalize the mime parts before creating the hash ...". I am 
wondering if it makes sense to decouple the canonicalization part from the 
mime signature transform. I am thinking if the canonicalization is explicitly 
defined, it may aid in interoperability.

 

2. Should the mime part signature transforms 
"exclude" certain Mime types? For instance, if the mime part attached is of type 
"application/pkcs7-signature", does it make sense to sign it 
(again)?

 

Thanks

 

/T$R
(Ramana Turlapati)

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
   

  
To:  

  
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:00 PM

  
Subject: [wss] Attachments Profile

  

  
Note that I updated the attachments profile proposal (v4) 
  uploaded to Kavi.

Diffed [1] and non-diffed [2] PDF available. Used 
  open office source for this [3].

Changes:

1) Added MIME part 
  signature transform to provide integrity for all attachments at once, to 
  protect against attachment insertion or deletion threat.

2) Added new 
  Decryption Transform mode for MIME parts - the Decryption Transform is a W3C 
  recommendation  [4] that allows a receiver to determine which encrypted 
  content must first be decrypted before signature verification. This is done by 
  specifying what does not need to be decrypted (ie what encrypted content is 
  covered by the signature).  An additional mode may be suitable for 
  attachments since the SwA proposal uses ciphertext in attachments instead of 
  <xenc:EncryptedData> elements. Defined namespace prefix for this 
  mode.

3) Updated reference for MIME to MIME v3, RFC2633 instead of RFC 
  2311

4)Defined draft URLs for MIME Part Signature 
  Transforms

5)Editorial cleanup, expand WSS:

Open 
  issues

Is cid scheme adequate, or should Content-Location and 
  corresponding URLS (requiring resolution mechanism) be supported. Initial 
  proposal restricted to Content-ID.

References

  

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/7236/wss-swa-profile-1.0-draft-04-diff.pdf

[2]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/7236/wss-swa-profile-1.0-draft-04.pdf

[3] 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/7236/wss-swa-profile-1.0-draft-04.sxw

  
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-decrypt 

  

regards, 
  Frederick

Frederick 
Hirsch
Nokia