← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Minutes from August 24 meeting

From
Paula K Austel <>
Date
2004-08-24T16:07:14+00:00
ID
Thread
Minutes from August 24 meeting
1. Call to order, roll call 

Paula Austel - minutes

Steve Anderson - roll call

Attendance of Voting Members

 

  Gene Thurston AmberPoint

  Frank Siebenlist Argonne National
Lab

  Hal Lockhart BEA

  Corinna Witt BEA

  Merlin Hughes Betrusted

  Thomas DeMartini ContentGuard

  Guillermo Lao ContentGuard

  Sam Wei Documentum

  Tim Moses Entrust

  Dana Kaufman Forum Systems

  Toshihiro Nishimura Fujitsu

  Kefeng Chen GeoTrust

  Irving Reid HP

  Kojiro Nakayama Hitachi

  Paula Austel IBM

  Maryann Hondo IBM

  Kelvin Lawrence IBM

  Anthony Nadalin IBM

  Nataraj Nagaratnam IBM

  Bob Morgan Internet2

  Kate Cherry Lockheed Martin

  Vijay Gajjala Microsoft

  Alan Geller Microsoft

  Chris Kaler Microsoft

  Richard Levinson Netegrity

  Prateek Mishra Netegrity

  Frederick Hirsch Nokia

  Abbie Barbir Nortel

  Lloyd Burch Novell

  Charles Knouse Oblix

  Steve Anderson OpenNetwork

  Vamsi Motukuru Oracle

  Ben Hammond RSA Security

  Andrew Nash RSA Security

  Rob Philpott RSA Security

  Martijn de Boer SAP

  Coumara Radja Sarvega

  Pete Wenzel SeeBeyond

  Jeff Hodges Sun Microsystems

  Ronald Monzillo Sun Microsystems

  Jan Alexander Systinet

  Symon Chang TIBCO

  John Weiland US Navy

  Phillip Hallam-Baker VeriSign

  Maneesh Sahu Westbridge Technology

 

 

Attendance of Prospective Members

 

  Chong-Jen Hsu CommerceOne

 

 

Membership Status Changes

 

  Nazrul Islam CommerceOne - Requested
membership 8/16/2004

  Chong-Jen Hsu CommerceOne - Requested
membership 8/23/2004

  Steven Lewis Booz Allen Hamilton -
Lost voting status after 8/24/2004 call

 

2. Reading/approving minutes of last meeting (August 10th)

Approved

 

3. Quick update on chair actions (mostly web page updates)

Kelvin - 

Rebuilt web page from scratch to update links. 

The web page points to public errata #1 instead of
errata #2. This needs to be fixed. Could not find version 2 in Kavi. Will
update web page as soon as the new version (#3) is ready. 

People need to specify when a document should be public
(by default will make document private).  

4. Public review status 

REL and SAML specs in public review.

There was a question about whether there was one comment
on SAML profile. Ron had not seen the comment so it should be brought to
his attention if there is a comment.

Security Services (SAML) TC has announced review of
SAML token profile but the group has been busy with the SAML 2.0.

5. Errata status 

No normative changes for fixing errata. Tony can fix
non-normative issues if people agree. Do we need a new vote? 

Chris: editors to get errata updated as quickly as
possible and have an electronic vote.

Other activity is merging errata into new working
draft. 

Ron - few more edits needed to X509 profile for conversion
to V3. This is part of Issue 293. 

6. Status of other profiles

Frederick - sent out version 8 for SwA profile, fixes
issues 312 and 309. 

Tony update on Kerberos - not many comments. Need
to clarify that AP-REQ is at GSS level. 

Ron - Why are we defining wire protocols based on
APIs?

Chris - GSS is not an API

Ron - not a bad idea to have GSS support

AP-REQ part of Kerberos spec and GSS API wraps AP-REQ
with wrapper. 

Ron - can we have both? Can we have a GSS binding?
For a Kerberos mechanism it should be more native to Kerberos.

Hal - type identifier to distinguish between tgt and
service tickets. Can we extend the type identifier? 

Ron - agrees, but processing model for GSS is different

Chris - I don't think the processing model is different

ACTION Tony - Investigate the use of GSS to
see if it is consistent with AP-REQ in Kerberos. If so, use BST type to
distinguish. 

Comment - Do not want GSS API when used here to mean
MUST be Kerberos

7. Issue list review 

Version 47 of issue list

Pending Issues:

Issue 282,290: no update

Issue 298: come back to this

Issue 309: 2 issues, SwA is fixed, general comment
about core. non-normative. 

Action for editors to review 309 for version
3 of errata

Open issues:

Issue 310:

2 new comments on the list. What's the difference
between 310 and 298. 298 - token ordering in the core. 310 - Vijay sent
a note to the list. 

Vijay - Use issuer/serial has issues on what certificate
to use. Hash on the certificate in case SKI is not present. Presented an
alternate solution. 

Hal - what is the issue with issuer/serial?

Based on X500 name matching. 

Chris - a lot of people have interop problems on X500
matching because they use shortname and there is not a lot of consistency
in this space

Hal - can insist on exact binary match. 

Chris - if you want to use issuer/serial then go ahead,
if you want to use Key Identifier can we specify an algorithm?

Chris - RFCs give just a digest of public key

Hal - using thumbprint

Chris- thumbprint unambiguous

Hal - no document that defines thumbprint but it is
common in industry

Ron - we have products that store certs. 

Chris - leave this as open and come back to this in
next call

Ron - if there isn't an SKI - don't use SKIs?

Chris - what to do if there isn't an SKI, can we come
up with a SHA-1 that is unambiguous. 

Ron - Issue: May need to have control over indexing
of cert store. 

Chris - does every store do index by issuer/serial?

Hal - more likely for this kind of thumbprint

Phil - putting certificates in a directory not a good
idea anyway.

Need to revisit this issue

Issue 312:

mark as pending for people to review draft 8 of SwA
profile

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/8893/wss-swa-profile-1.0-draft-08-diff.pdf

Part of 312 is an action against core:

Reference lists can be in more than one place. Ambiguous
in core which you need to use in some circumstances.

Make clarification: If encrypted data is referenced
from encrypted key within the security header you don't need separate ref
list as a child of security header.

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200408/msg00043.html
 

ACTION: Capture as a separate issue

Need encrypted data in security header for attachments.

Issue 313:

Pending new errata

Issue 314:

Pending new errata

Issue 315: 

Dana - provide PKI example

Dana - in the core doc there are no PKI examples.
Should we add one?

Chris - people did not want a forward reference from
core to other token profiles. 

Dana - can we clarify that the lack of a PKI example
does not mean that it is not recommended?

Chris - spec specifies that any token type can be
used. 

Hal - add text to specify why examples are limited
in the core. Direct readers to look at examples in relevant profile documents.

Action on Hal - Draft proposed errata text
for above.

Issue 316: 

SwA - fixed in draft 8, mark as closed. Minor namespace
issue.

Dana - does this also apply to core?

Frederick - I don't think so.

Issues 317-318: 

New proposals related to deferred items. Sent to the
list late yesterday.

Alan - encrypted header proposal - standardize treating
headers that are encrypted with new EncryptedHeader element.

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200408/msg00057.html

Ron - are you suggesting this for the core doc? 

Alan - yes

Alan - the next document is a separate profile - EncryptedKey
as a token profile

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200408/msg00058.html

Refer to an EncrypedKey in another(future) message.
 Can be done with no changes to core. 

last proposal - signature confirmation - demonstrate
that the response is for the request that was sent.

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200408/msg00059.html

Leave these open - people should review and discuss
on the list. 

Postponed items:

Issue 67: 

Hal - posted document, named profile but not really
a profile. Defines 5 symbols for usage value. 

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200408/msg00064.html

Mark this as open and TC should review. 

8. Interop planning status (Kerberos, SwA)

SwA interop - Frederick (Blake could not attend today)

7 out of 8 companies can participate

Most companies can make end of Oct to mid Nov

2 proposed dates: week of Oct 25 or week of Nov 15

Need to have people vote on which date they prefer.

Document for scenarios should be ready for next meeting.

Alan - no updates on Kerberos interop

 

9. Other business

Kelvin - Public review ends on the 29th. Have not
seen any comments. If there is one on SAML then no-one knows about it.

Rob - will repost a request to the SAML TC

Hal - WS-I BSP did not find much with the SAML spec
(there is a question about a MUST statement)

New issue: SAML spec listed as an interim draft not
a committee draft

New Issue: Currently named WSS-SAML-15 - needs official
committee draft naming

Need to make changes and reapprove as committee draft.

Kelvin - model it on naming from the past - don't
have exact numbers yet

New Issue: REL profile needs updating too (for naming).

Can't change drafts until after public review period.

Hal - no substantial comments from BSP group.

Kelvin - Need new sponsors for calls 

10. Adjournment 

Adjourned at 11:09am EDT

 

----------------------------------------------------------

Paula K. Austel

Web Services Security

IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

(914)784-5025

Tieline 863-5025
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →