SwA timing

I agree that it is important to move this SwA work 
along.

 

It is apparent that there is one section of the SwA profile 
that may introduce problems, that is the section on including attachment headers 
in signatures. There is an open issue regarding which headers to 
include.

 

For this reason I have the following 
questions:

 

1. Does anyone have a pressing need to secure headers at 
this time? If not, we could remove this capability from this draft, 
simplifying  the specification and interop. This would reduce the 
functionality. I would like to confirm that people agree this should stay 
in.

 

2. If committee members feel this section is important, 
please review it and let me know which attachment headers should be included and 
which not (e.g. Content-Length etc, arbitrary headers etc), and whether 
correction is needed to the section.

 

I would like to address this by tomorrow if possible, so 
that a new stable draft can go out, giving people time to look at it before the 
next meeting.

 

Thanks

 

regards, Frederick 

 

Frederick Hirsch

Nokia

From: ext Anthony Nadalin 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:08 
PM
To: Blake Dournaee
Cc: 

Subject: Re: [wss] SwA Interop Proposed 
Date

Ideally we don't want to hold up BSP so earlier the better, off the cuff IBM 
could do an early/mid Oct. interop date. So if we have several companies ready 
in Oct. we should run with that and follow up with another if folks want to test 
thier interoperability.

Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 
512.289.4122
' 
src="gif00020.gif" width=16>"Blake Dournaee" 
<>

  
  

    
      
        
          
            "Blake Dournaee" 
              <> 
              
08/10/2004 11:32 AM

    
      
        
        

          

            
To

          
<>

        

          

            
cc

          

        

          

            
Subject

          
[wss] SwA Interop Proposed Date

      
        
        

          
          

All,

Can 
each of the vendors below provide me with an ideal timeframe for an
interop 
date for SwA? I will cluster the groups and we can have 
two
interops.

The interop scenarios document is still 
pending.

IBM
Hitachi
DataPower
Cyclone 
Commerce
Sun
Westbridge
CA

Blake Dournaee
Senior Security 
Architect
http://wwww.sarvega.com

To 
unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS 
TC), go to http://www.oasis-openorg/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.