RE: Preferred method of representing invalid XML chars in <source>?

Kristian Walsh,

I've not heard of invalid characters in an XML document. Usually,
non-printable characters are represented by their character reference. I
frequently use '
' to represent CR/LF.

For example,

<trans-unit id="a920cf">
	<source xml:lang="en">Three tabs follow&#08;&#08;&#08; then the text
continues</source>
</trans-unit>

Regards,

Doug Domeny
Software Analyst

Ektron, Inc.
+1 603 594-0249 x212
http://www.ektron.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Kristian Walsh [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:28 AM
To: 
Subject: Preferred method of representing invalid XML chars in <source>?


Hi,

I am developing an application which creates XLIFF 1.0 documents from
source data. Unfortunately, sometimes this source data contains
character codes below U+0020, which are invalid in an XML document.

I am unsure of the "canonical" way to deal with this in XLIFF 1.0
(version 1.1 is not an option for this application); as far as I can
see, <x/>, <g/> and <ph> can all be used for this purpose, as below:


Form 1: <x>

<trans-unit id="a920cf">
	<source xml:lang="en">Three tabs follow<x id="a920d0"
ctype="character" clone="yes" ts="MyTool:chars=0008,0008,0008"> then
the text continues</source>
</trans-unit>


Form 2: <g>

<trans-unit id="a920cf">
	<source xml:lang="en">Three tabs follow<g id="a920d0"
ctype="character" clone="yes" ts="MyTool:chars">0008,0008,0008</g> then
the text continues</source>
</trans-unit>


Form 3: <ph>

<trans-unit id="a920cf">
	<source xml:lang="en">Three tabs follow<ph id="a920d0"
ctype="character" ts="MyTool:chars">0008,0008,0008</ph> then the text
continues</source>
</trans-unit>


So my two questions are:

  1. Which of the above forms is preferred in XLIFF 1.0 for representing
non-XML characters inside source (and/or target) data?

  2. Is there a standard ctype attribute value for "raw character codes"?

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated,
--
Kristian