Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] wrong declaration of merged-trans attribute in xliff 1.2 xsds

From
Rodolfo M. Raya <>
Date
2010-03-10T20:42:50+00:00
ID
005c01cac092$207531b0$615f9510$@com
Thread
RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] wrong declaration of merged-trans attribute in xliff 1.2 xsds
Hi,

I reported this problem when testing XLIFFChecker. Doug fixed the schemas and sent them to the list.

I will put the schemas and specification on SVN this weekend. You will get the links by email automatically.

Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya   <>
Maxprograms      http://www.maxprograms.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 9:15 PM
> To: Rodolfo M. Raya
> Cc: ; Andre Schnabel; xliff-
> 
> Subject: Re: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] wrong declaration of merged-
> trans attribute in xliff 1.2 xsds
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Is there a public draft of the 1.2 errata document somewhere? If not,
> is the wiki errata page [1] something we want to keep updated? I can't
> find this specific issue listed there.
> 
> [1] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF1.2/Errata
> 
> 
> cheers,
> asgeir
> 
> ----- "Rodolfo M. Raya" <> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andre Schnabel [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:56 PM
> > > To: 
> > > Subject: [xliff-comment] wrong declaration of merged-trans
> attribute
> > in
> > > xliff 1.2 xsds
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I think, there is a discrepancy between the XLIFF 1.2 spec and xsd
> > for
> > > the
> > > merged-trans attribute.
> > >
> > > According to the spec, this attribute should only be used in the
> > group
> > > element. The defined default value is "no".
> > >
> > > In the xsd (both transitional and strict) the attribute is defined
> > > twice.
> > > One declaration follows the spec (optional attribute of group
> > element,
> > > derfalut value='no'). But there is a second declaration for the
> > > trans-unit element (default value defined with "yes").
> > >
> > > This should be corrected in future version.
> > >
> > > Can anyone comment, what is correct here? Spec or xsd ?
> >
> > Dear Andre,
> >
> > This a known error in the schema. It has been reported and fixed. The
> > corrected version will be included in an errata to be published soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rodolfo
> > --
> > Rodolfo M. Raya   <>
> > Maxprograms      http://www.maxprograms.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> > https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Next in thread → Next in month →