Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 2.0 Comments - attributes from xml namespace
OK, but at the very least, we should give an example of how to declare a namespace for a module so that it can be included properly in the XLIFF document. People not familiar with xml namespaces will not understand that in order for <val:validation> to be valid, they need to declare it like so: <xliff xmlns:val="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:validation …> Ryan From: Yves Savourel [mailto:] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:27 AM To: Subject: RE: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 2.0 Comments - attributes from xml namespace I don’t think it’s needed. That attribute is treated as a special case and does not need to be declared. Actually it’s not possible to define them in a schema. -ys From: Ryan King [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:52 PM To: Cc: Subject: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 2.0 Comments - attributes from xml namespace In section 2.3.2, both xml:lang and xml:namespace are defined. They are also listed as optional attributes for <source> and <target>. Shouldn’t we also define xmlns in that section and list it as an optional attribute for <xliff> since this is the main mechanism for declaring a module’s namespace? For example: <xliff xmlns:xlf="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:2.0" xmlns:val="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:validation:2.0" xmlns:ctr="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:changeTracking:2.0" xmlns:mda="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:metadata:2.0" xmlns:mtc="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:matches:2.0" xmlns:res="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:resourceData:2.0" version="2.0" srcLang="en-US" tgtLang="de-DE"> Thanks, Ryan
Next in thread →
Next in month →